1.3 Social Decentering Theory and Model: Part 1 Summary and Part 2 Preview – Social Decentering

When the three methods produce competing perspectives, decenterers are faced with a dilemma as to which analysis to accept. The three methods can actually interfere with each other and diminish the quality of all the methods. For example, role-taking research with children suggests that children must learn to control the impact of the highly accessible and salient information on self when considering another person’s perspective (Higgins, 1981). A tendency to be egocentric in applying the use of self method of social decentering can undermine the use of the other two methods. Dunning and Hayes (1996) found participants to be egocentric in their social judgments about others, most frequently using themselves as the source of comparison, followed by the use of acquaintances, population norms, and then people similar to the target. Epley and Caruso (2009) observed that using the most immediate and easily accessible information provided by an individual’s own perspective and experiences (use of self method of social decentering) undermines efforts to engage in considering another person’s perspective (use of specific-other).

1.3Social Decentering Theory and Model: Part 1 Summary and Part 2 Preview

Social decentering is defined as a multidimensional social cognitive process that involves taking into account another person’s feelings, thoughts, perspectives, and other dispositions in a given situation. Working from that conceptualization, the first steps in this theory and model are presented in this chapter. Specifically, the activation step reflects the factors that contribute to initiating people’s efforts to socially decenter. Activation is spurred by both internal triggers that arise from a given person’s own cognitive processing and by external triggers that stimulate social decentering. The next step involves input or information that is drawn from experiences and observations as well as from imagination. The third step discussed in this chapter is about the three methods used to analyze the information: use of self, use of specific-other, and use of generalized-other. When applying use of self, individuals use their own related experiences in a given situation or imagine their reactions to a given situation, and use the resulting analysis to decenter with others. Use of specific-other is the propensity to think about specific people the decenterer knows and apply that knowledge, observations, or imaginings to understanding the other. Finally, just as we have implicit personality theories that are applied to categories of people, the use of generalized- others involves utilizing our general understanding of people or groups of people as the foundation for analyzing a given person in a given situation.

The next chapter provides the final two components in the social decentering process: internal cognitive and affective responses and then, potentially, external responses in the form of strategy and actions. The external responses are not really part of the social decentering process, but instead reflect ways in which people might act upon the results of their social decentering. Thus, after considering a friend’s dispositions upon having his or her romantic relationship come to an end, an individual has lots of options for how to act, options which can be analyzed through social decentering, but which are dependent upon additional interpersonal skills.


Adams-Webber, J. R. (2002). Prototypicality of self and differentiating among others in terms of personal constructs. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 16, 341–347.

Afifi, W.A., & Guerrero, L. K. (2000). Motivations underlying topic avoidance in close relationships. In S. Petronio (Ed.), Balancing the secrets of private disclosures (pp. 165–180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Alicke, M. D., Klotz, M. L., Breitenbecher, D. L., Yurak, T. J., & Vredenburg, D. S. (1995). Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 804–825.

Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Ames, D. R. (2004). Inside the mind reader’s tool kit: Projection and stereotyping in mental state inference. Journal of personality and social psychology, 87, 340–353.

Ames, D. R. (2005). Everyday solutions to the problem of other minds: Which tools are used when? In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 158–173). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Aronfreed, J. (1968). Conduct and conscience: The socialization of internalized control over behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Ashmore, R. D. (1981). Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 37–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ashmore, R. D., & Del Boca, F. K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 1–36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Barnett, M. A. (1984). Perspective-taking and empathy in the child’s prosocial behavior. In H. E. Sypher & J. L. Applegate (Eds.), Communication in children and adults (pp. 43–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Batson, C. D. (2009). Two forms of perspective-taking: Imaging how another feels and imagining how you would feel. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (267–280). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Batson, C. D., Early, S., & Salvarani, G. (1997). Perspective-taking: Imaging how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758.

Beebe, S. A., Beebe, S. J. & Redmond, M. V. (2017). Interpersonal communication: Relating to others. 8th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Beer, J. S., & Ochsner, K. N. (2006). Social cognition: A multi level analysis. Brain Research, 1079, 98–105.

Berger, C. R. (2002). Goals and Knowledge Structures in Social Interaction. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication, 3rd ed. (pp. 181–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Berger, C. R., & Bradac, J. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relations. Baltimore, MD: Edward Arnold.

Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Biernat, M. (2005). Standards and expectations. New York, NY: Routledge.

Bloom, P. (2017). Empathy, schmempathy: Response to Zaki. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 60–61.

Boukricha, H. (2008). A first approach for simulating affective theory of mind through mimicry and role-taking. Paper from The Third International Conference on Cognitive Science, Moscow, Russia.

Bronfenbrenner, U., Harding, J., & Gallwey, M. (1968). The measurement of skill in social perception. In D. C. McClelland et al. (Eds.), Talent and society: New perspectives in the identification of talent (pp. 29–111). Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.

Burgoon, J. (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129–142.

Byrne, R. M. J. (2005). The rational imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. F., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 141–156.

Carpenter, J. M., Green, M. C., & Vacharkulksemsuk, T. (2016). Beyond perspective-taking: Mind-reading motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 40, 358–374.

Cheek, N. D. (2015). Taking perspective the next time around. Commentary on: “Perceived perspective-taking: When others walk in our shoes.” Frontiers in Psychology, 6. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00434.

Clark, R. A., & Delia, J. G. (1977). Cognitive complexity, social perspective-taking, and functional persuasive skills in second- to ninth-grade children. Human Communication Research, 3, 128–134.

Colvin, C. R., & Bundick, M. J. (2001). In search of the good judge of personality: Some methodological and theoretical concerns. In J. A. Hall and F. J. Bernieri (Eds.), Interpersonal sensitivity: Theory and measurement (pp. 47–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “Understanding of others” and “Assumed similarity.” Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177–193.

Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8, 144–153.

Davis, M. H. (2005). A “constituent” approach to the study of perspective-taking: What are the fundamental elements? In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 44–55). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Deutsch, F., & Madle, R. A. (1975). Empathy: Historic and current conceptualizations, measurement, and a cognitive theoretical perspective. Human Development, 18, 267–287.

Devine, P. G., Hamilton, D. L., & Ostrom, T. M. (eds.) (1994). Social cognition: Impact on social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Dickson, W. P. (1982). Two decades of referential communication research: A review and meta-analysis. In C. J. Brainerd & M. Pressly (Eds.), Verbal processes in children (pp. 1–34). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Dunning, D. (2001). On the motives underlying social cognition. In A. Tesser & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 348–374). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Dunning, D., & Hayes, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 213–229.

Dweck, C. S. (1996). Implicit theories as organizers of goals and behavior. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action (pp. 69–90). New York, NY: Guilford.

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A world from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285.

Dymond, R. (1945). A preliminary investigation of the relationships of insight and empathy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12, 228–233.

Eiser, J. R., Pahl, S., & Prins, Y. R. A. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and the direction of self-other comparisons. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 77–84.

Epley, N., & Caruso, E. M. (2009). Perspective-taking: Misstepping into other’s shoes. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 295–309). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Fiedler, F. (1968). Personality and situational determinants of leadership effectiveness. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory, 3rd ed. (pp. 362–380). New York, NY: Harper and Row.

Fisher, W. (1984). Narration as a human communication paradigm: The case of public moral argument. Communication Monographs, 51, 1–22.

Fiske, S. T. (1993). Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 155–194.

Ford, T. E., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1995). Effects of epistemic motivations on the use of accessible constructs in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 950–962.

Förster, J., & Lieberman, N. (2007). Knowledge activation. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. (pp. 201–231). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Försterling, F. (2001). Attribution: An introduction to theories, research and applications. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.

Frantz, C. M., & Janoff-Bulman, R. (2000). Considering both sides: The limits of perspective-taking. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 31–42.

Funder, D. C. (1995). Stereotypes, base rates, and the fundamental attribution mistake: A content-based approach to judgmental accuracy. In Y. T. Lee, L. J. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 141–156). Washingon, DC: American Psychological Association.

Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Gaut, B. (2003). Creativity and imagination. In B. Gaut & P. Livingston (Eds.), The creation of art: New essays in philosophical aesthetics (pp. 148–173). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Gehlbach, H. (2004). A new perspective on perspective-taking: A multidimensional approach to conceptualizing an aptitude. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 207–234.

Gerace, A., Day, A., Casey, S., & Mohr, P. (2013). An exploratory investigation of the process of perspective-taking in interpersonal situations. Journal of Relationships Research, 4, 1–12.

Gnepp, J. (1989) Children’s use of personal information to understand other people’s feelings. In Saarni, C. & Harris, P. L. (Eds.), Children’s understanding of emotion (pp. 151–180). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Graham, T., & Ickes, W. (1997). When women’s intuition isn’t greater than men’s. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 117–143). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Self-disclosure in personal relationships. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 409–428). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Gudykunst, W. B., & Hall, B. J. (1994). Strategies for effective communication and adaptation in intergroup contexts. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 225–272). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hale, C. L., & Delia, J. G. (1976). Cognitive complexity and social perspective-taking. Communication Monographs, 43, 195–203.

Harvey, J. H., & Omarzu, J. (1999). Minding the close relationship: A theory of relationship enhancement. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Hastorf, A. H., Schneider, D. J., & Polefka, J. (1970). Person perception. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.

Higgins, E. T. (1981). Role-taking and social judgment: Alternative developmental perspectives and processes. In J. H. Flavell and L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development: Frontiers and possible futures (pp. 119–153). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Hodges, S. D., Kiel, J. K., Kramer, A. D. I., Veach, D., & Villanueva, B. R. (2010). Giving birth to empathy: The effects of similar experience on empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and perceived empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 398–409.

Hojat, M. (2016). Empathy in health professions education and patient care. New York, NY: Springer.

Honeycutt, J. M., Zagaki, K. S., & Edwards, R. (1990). Imagined interaction and interpersonal communication. Communication Reports, 3, 1–8.

Howard, J. A., & Renfrow, D. G. (2003). Social cognition. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 259–282). New York, NY: Plenum.

Ickes, W. J. (2003). Everyday mind reading: Understanding what other people think and feel. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?, Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.

Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 730–742.

Jussim, L., Cain, T. R., Crawford, J. T., Harber, K., & Cohen, F. (2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes. In T. D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination (pp. 199–228). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.

Karniol, R. (1990). Reading people’s minds: A transformation rule model for predicting others’ thoughts and feelings. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 23 (pp. 211–248). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.

Karniol, R. (2003). Egocentrism versus protcentrism: The status of self in social prediction. Psychological review, 110, 564–580.

Keysar, B. (2007). Communication and miscommunication: The role of egocentric processes. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7, 71–84.

Keysar, B., Barr, D. J., & Horton, W. S. (1998). The egocentric basis of language use: Insights from a processing approach. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 46–50.

Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1996). Social psychological models of interpersonal communication. In E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 655–701). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Langer, E. J. (1978). Rethinking the role of thought in social interaction. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research: Volume 2 (pp. 35–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Levy, S. R., Stroessner, S. J., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1421–1436.

Lin, S., Keysar, B., & Epley, N. (2010). Reflexively mindblind: Using theory of mind to interpret behavior requires effortful attention. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 551–556.

Long, E. C. J. (1994). Maintaining a stable marriage: Perspective-taking as a predictor or a propensity to divorce. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 21, 121–138.

Macrae, C. N., & Quadflieg, S. (2010). Perceiving people. In S. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, 5th ed. (pp. 428–463). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Martin, L. L., & Achee, J. W. (1992). Beyond accessibility: The role of processing objectives in judgment. In L. L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), The construction of social judgments (pp. 195–216). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

Mead, G. H. (1932). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525–543.

Meneses, R. W., & Larkin, M. (2017). The experience of empathy: Intuitive, sympathetic, and intellectual aspects of social understanding. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 57, 2–32.

Miller, D. T., Turnball, W., & McFarland, C. (1990). Counterfactual thinking and social perception: Thinking about what might have been. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 23 (pp. 305–332). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (2010). The situated person. In B. Mesquita, L. F. Barrett, & E. R. Smith (Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 149–173). New York, NY: Guildford Press.

Mitchell, J. P. (2009). Inferences about mental states. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1309–1316.

Morris, M. W., Ames, D. R., & Knowles, E. D. (1998). What we theorize when we theorize that we theorize: Examining the “Implicit Theory” construct from a cross-disciplinary perspective. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive social psychology: The Princeton symposium on the legacy and future of social cognition (pp. 143–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Moskowitz, G. B. (2005). Social cognition: Understanding self and others. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., Bellavia, G., Griffin, D. W., & Dolderman, D. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581.

Myers, M. W., & Hodges, S. D. (2009). Making it up and making do: Simulation, imagination, and empathic accuracy. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 281–294). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Neuberg, S. L. (1989). The goal of forming accurate impressions during social interactions: Attenuating the impact of negative expectancies. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 374–386.

Nickerson, R. S., Butler, S. F., & Carlin, M. (2009). Empathy and knowledge projection. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 43–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ottati, V. & Lee, Y. (1995). Accuracy: A neglected component of stereotype research. In Y. Lee, L. J. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 29–59). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Pahl, S., Eiser, J. R., & White, M. P. (2009). Boundaries of self-positivity: The effect of comparison focus in self-friend comparisons. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 413–424.

Park, H. S., & Raile, A. N. W. (2010). Perspective-taking and communication satisfaction in coworker dyads. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 569–581.

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Ponn, C. S. K., & Koehler, D. J. (2006). Lay personality knowledge and dispositionist thinking: A knowledge-activation framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 177–191.

Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 1–71.

Rafaeli, E., & Hiller, A. (2010). Self-complexity: A source of resilience? In J. W. Reich, A. J. Zautra, & J. S. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of adult resilience (pp. 171–192). New York, NY: Guildford.

Read, S. J., & Collins, N. L. (1992). Accounting for relationships: A knowledge structure approach. In J. H. Harvey, T. L. Orbuch, & A. L. Weber (Eds.), Attributions, accounts, and close relationships (pp. 116–143). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Redmond, M. V. (1989). The functions of empathy (decentering) in human relations. Human Relations, 42, 593–605.

Redmond, M. V. (1995). A multidimensional theory and measure of social decentering. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 35–58.

Redmond, M. V. (2005). Interpersonal content adaptation in everyday interactions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Boston, MA.

Redmond, M. V. (2006). Relationship-specific social decentering: Tapping partner specific empathy and partner specific perspective-taking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Antonio, Texas.

Reeder, G. D. (2009). Mindreading and dispositional inference: MIM revised and extended. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 73–83.

Reeder, G. D. & Trafimow, D. (2005). Attributing motives to other people. In B. F. Malle & S. D. Hodges (Eds.), Other minds: How humans bridge the divide between self and others (pp. 106–123). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Reis, H. T., & Shaver, P. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–390). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Roese, N. J., & Sherman, J. W. (2007). Expectancy. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. (pp. 91–115). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Rosenberg, S., & Sedlak, A. (1972). Structural representations of implicit personality theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 6 (pp. 235–298). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351–357.

Sakellaropoulo, M., & Baldwin, M. W. (2006). Interpersonal cognition and the relational self: Paving the empirical road for dialogical science. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 1, 47–66.

Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.

Schneider, D. J. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 294–309.

Schwarz, N. (1998). Warmer and more social: Recent developments in cognitive social psychology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 239–264.

Sillars, A. L. (1985). Interpersonal perception in relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 277–305). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Sillars, A. L., Roberts, L. J., Leonard, K. E., & Dun, T. (2000). Cognition during marital conflict: The relationship of thought and talk. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 479–502.

Sillars, A. L., & Scott, M. D. (1983). Interpersonal perception between intimates: An integrative review. Human Communication Research, 10, 153–176.

Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Blackstone, T. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 629–641.

Stangor, C. (2005). Content and application inaccuracy in social stereotyping. In Y. T. Lee, L. J. Jussim, & C. R. McCauley (Eds.), Stereotype accuracy: Toward appreciating group differences (pp. 275–292). Washingon, DC: American Psychological Association.

Stotland, E., Mathews, K. E., Sherman, S. E., Hansson, R. O., & Richardson, B. Z. (1978). Empathy, fantasy and helping. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Talbert, B. (2017). Overthinking and other minds: The analysis paralysis. Social Epistemology, 31, 545–556.

Tamir, D. I., & Mitchell, J. P. (2013). Anchoring and adjustment during social inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 151–162.

Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 83–114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Thomas, G., & Fletcher, G. J. O. (1997). Empathic accuracy in close relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 194–217). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Thomas, G., Fletcher, G. J. O., & Lange, C. (1997). On-line accuracy empathic accuracy in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 839–850.

Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1994). Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 474–490.

Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2005). Cross-situational projection. In M. D. Alicke, D. A. Dunning, & J. I. Krueger (Eds.), The self in social judgement (pp. 43–66). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Vorauer, J. (2013). The case for and against perspective-taking. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimentalsSocial psychology, Vol. 48 (pp. 59–115). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Waldron, V. R. (1997). Toward a theory of interactive conversational planning. In J. O. Greene (Ed.), Message production: Advances in communication theory (pp. 151–170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Wyer, R. S. Jr. (2006). Three models of information processing: An evaluation and conceptual integration. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 185–255.

Wyer, R. S. Jr., & Guenfeld, D. H. (1995) Information processing in interpersonal communication. In D. E. Hewes (Ed.), The cognitive bases of interpersonal communication (pp. 7–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1608–1647.

Zaki, J. (2017). Moving beyond stereotypes of empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 59–60.

Zaki, J., & Cikara, M. (2015). Addressing empathic failures. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 471–176.

Zorn, T. E., McKinney, M. S., & Moran, M. M. (1993). Structure of interpersonal construct systems: One system or many? International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 139–166.