Bibliography – Responsibility and Freedom

Bibliography

  1. [ADA 11] ADAM B., GROVES C., “Futures tended: care and future-oriented responsibility”, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, vol. 31, pp. 17–27, 2011.
  2. [ADO 96] ADORNO W.T., Aesthetic Theory, University of Minnesota Press, 1996.
  3. [ARE 82] ARENDT H., Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, 1982.
  4. [ARE 91] ARENDT H., On Revolution, Penguin, London, 1991.
  5. [ARE 05] ARENDT H., Responsibility and Judgment, Schocken, Berlin, 2005.
  6. [ARI 09] ARISTOTLE, Nicomachean Ethics, Oxford University Press, 2009.
  7. [ARN 69] ARNSTEIN S., “A ladder of citizen participation”, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 216–224, July 1969.
  8. [BAC 10] BACKHAUS G., The Beginnings of Political Economy: Johann Heinrich Gottlob Von Justi, Springer, New York, 2010.
  9. [BAX 11] BAXTER H., Habermas: the Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, Stanford University Press, 2011.
  10. [BEA 11] BEAUVOIR DE S., The Second Sex, Vintage, London, 2011.
  11. [BEC 92] BECK U., Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Sage Publications, London, 1992.
  12. [BEN 48] BENTHAM J., LAFLEUR L.J., An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Hafner Pub. Co., New York, 1948.
  13. [BER 02] BERLIN I., Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press, 2002.
  14. [BES 13] BESSANT J., “Innovation in the twenty-first century”, in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  15. [BIJ 87] BIJKER W., HUGHES T., PINCH T., The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
  16. [BIJ 94] BIJKER W., LAW J. (eds), Shaping Technology and Building Society, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
  17. [BIM 96] BIMBER B., The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment, State University of New York Press, New York, 1996.
  18. [BLO 14] BLOK V., “Look who’s talking: responsible innovation, the paradox of dialogue and the voice of the other in communication and negotiation processes”, Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 2, pp. 171–190, 2014.
  19. [BOD 85] BODMER W.F., The Public Understanding of Science, The Royal Society, London, 1985.
  20. [BOL 99] BOLTANSKI L., CHIAPELLO E., The New Spirit of Capitalism, Verso, London, 1999.
  21. [BOL 11] BOLTANSKI L., GREGORY E., On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation, Polity Press, MA, 2011.
  22. [BOU 02] BOUHAÏ N., Lire, réécrire et partager le savoir sur le web: problèmes et solutions, PhD Thesis, University of Paris VIII Saint Denis, 2002.
  23. [BOV 98] BOVENS M., The Quest for Responsibility. Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organisations, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
  24. [BOV 13] BOVENS M., GOODIN R.E., SCHILLEMANS T. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Accountability, Oxford University Press, 2013.
  25. [BRA 98] BRANDOM R.B., Making it Explicit: Reasoning, Representing and Discursive Commitment, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
  26. [BRÄ 12] BRÄUTIGAM T., “PIA: cornerstone of privacy compliance at Nokia”, in WRIGHT D., DE HERT P., Privacy Impact Assessment, Springer, Dordrecht, 2012.
  27. [BRO 93] BROWN L. (ed.), The New Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, vol. 2 Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
  28. [BUT 06] BUTLER J., Gender Trouble. Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, Routledge, New York, 2006.
  29. [CAL 09] CALLON M., LASCOUMES P., BARTHE Y., Acting in an Uncertain World, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009.
  30. [CAR 62] CARSON R., Silent Spring, Penguin Classics, London, 1962.
  31. [COM 03] COMPTE C., “Enjeux de la formation ouverte et à distance: technologies et apprentissages”, in SALEH I., LEPAGE D., BOUYAHI S. (eds), Les TIC au cœur de l’enseignement à distance, Actes Huit Coll., University of Paris VIII, 2003.
  32. [DÁV 07] DÁVILA GÓMEZ A.M., CROWTHER D. (eds), Ethics, Psyche and Social Responsibility, Ashgate, Aldershot, 2007.
  33. [DEW 16] DEWEY J., Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, Macmillan, New York, 1916.
  34. [DEW 54] DEWEY J., The Public and its Problems, Swallow Press/Ohio University Press, 1954.
  35. [DUR 97] DURKHEIM E., The Division of Labor in Society, Free Press, New York, 1997.
  36. [DWO 78] DWORKIN R., Taking Right Seriously, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1978.
  37. [DWO 85] DWORKIN R., A Matter of Principle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1985.
  38. [DWO 88] DWORKIN R., Law’s Empire, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
  39. [EWA 86] EWALD F., L’Etat Providence, Grasset et Fasquelle, Paris, 1986.
  40. [FER 02] FERRY J.M., Valeures et Normes, Universite Libre Bruxelles, Brussels, 2002.
  41. [FIS 13] FISHER E., RIP A., “Responsible innovation: multi-level dynamics and soft interventions”, in OWEN R., HEINTZ M., BESSANT J. (eds), Responsible Innovation, Wiley, Chichester, 2013.
  42. [FŒS 15] FŒSSEL M., HABERMAS J., Critique and communication: philosophy’s missions. A conversation with Jürgen Habermas, available at: http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2015-10-16-habermas-en.html, 2015.
  43. [FRA 88] FRANKFURT H., The Importance of What We Care About, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  44. [FUN 06] FUNG A., “Varieties of participation in complex governance”, Public Administration Review, vol. 66, pp. 66–75, 2006.
  45. [FUN 12] FUNG A., “Continuous institutional innovation and the pragmatic conception of democracy”, Polity, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 609–624, 2012.
  46. [GEO 12] GEOGHEGAN-QUINN, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/responsible-research-and-innovation-leaflet_en.pdf, 2012.
  47. [GIA 15] GIANNI R., “Framework for the comparison of theories of responsible innovation in research”, GREAT Project, available at http://www.great-project.eu/D5.1, 2015.
  48. [GID 99] GIDDENS A., “Risk and responsibility”, The Modern Law Review, vol. 61, pp. 1–10, 1999.
  49. [GOD 07] GODIN B., “The linear model of innovation: the historical construction of an analytical framework”, Science, Technology and Human Values, vol. 31, no. 6, 2007.
  50. [GOO 95] GOODIN R.E., Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  51. [GRI 13] GRINBAUM A., GROVES C., “What is ‘responsible’ about responsible innovation? Understanding the ethical issues”, in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  52. [GRU 09] GRUNWALD A., “Technology assessment – concepts and methods”, in MEIJERS A. (ed.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Elsevier, 2009.
  53. [GRU 11] GRUNWALD A., “Responsible innovation: bringing together technology assessment, applied ethics, and STS research”, Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies, vol. 7, pp. 9– 31, 2011.
  54. [GRU 15] GRUNWALD A., “Technology assessment for responsible innovation”, in VAN DEN HOVEN J., DOORN N., SWIERSTRA T. et al. (eds), Responsible Innovation 1. Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2015.
  55. [GUN 98] GUNTHER K., “Communicative freedom, communicative power, and jurisgenesis”, in ROSENFELD M., ARATO A. (eds), Habermas on Law and Democracy: Critical Exchanges, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1998.
  56. [HAB 70] HABERMAS J., Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics, Beacon Press, Boston, 1970.
  57. [HAB 72] HABERMAS J., Knowledge and Human Interests, Beacon Press, 1972.
  58. [HAB 84] HABERMAS J., Theory of Communicative Action, Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.
  59. [HAB 98] HABERMAS J., Between Facts and Norms, Polity Press, Cambridge, 1998.
  60. [HAB 03] HABERMAS J., Truth and Justification, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.
  61. [HAB 12] HABERMAS J., The Crisis of the European Union, Polity, Cambridge, 2012.
  62. [HAB 15] HABERMAS J., “Critique et communication: les tâches de la philosophie”, Esprit, no. 417, pp. 40–54, August–September 2015.
  63. [HAR 88] HARAWAY D., “Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective”, Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 575–599, 1988.
  64. [HAR 94] HART H.L.A., The Concept of Law 2nd ed., Clarendon, Oxford, 1994.
  65. [HAR 01] HARRIMOES P. (ed.), Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle, 1896–2000, Environmental Issue Report 22, European Environment Agency, Brussels, 2001.
  66. [HAR 08] HART H.L.A., Punishment and Responsibility. Essays in the Philosophy of Law, Oxford University Press, 2008.
  67. [HEG 91] HEGEL G.W.F., Elements of the Philosophy of Right, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
  68. [HEI 08] HEIDEGGER M., Letter on Humanism, Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York, 2008.
  69. [HER 02] HERDER J.G., “On the cognition and sensation of human soul”, in Philosophical Writings, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
  70. [HOB 68] HOBBES T., Leviathan, Penguin, Harmondsworth, 1968.
  71. [HÖF 06] HÖFFE O., Kant’s Cosmopolitan Theory of Law and Peace, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.
  72. [HON 91] HONNETH A., The Critique of Power: Reflective Stages in a Critical Social Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
  73. [HON 95] HONNETH A., The Struggle for Recognition: the Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
  74. [HON 09] HONNETH A., Pathologies of Reason, Columbia University Press, New York, 2009.
  75. [HON 10] HONNETH A., Das Ich im Wir, Suhrkamp, Berlin, 2010.
  76. [HON 14a] HONNETH A., Freedom’s Right. The Social Foundations of Democratic Life, Polity Press, Paris, 2014.
  77. [HON 14b] HONNETH A., De la reconnaissance à la liberté, Bord de l’eau, Paris, 2014.
  78. [HOR 02] HORKHEIMER M., ADORNO T.W., Dialectics of Enlightment, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 2002.
  79. [HUS 70] HUSSERL E., The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy, Northwestern University Press, Chicago, 1970.
  80. [JAC 13] JACOB K., VAN DEN HOVEN J., NIELSEN L. et al., Options for strenghtening RRI, Report of the Expert Group on the State of Art in Europe on Responsible Research and Innovation, EU Commission, 2013.
  81. [JAS 90] JASANOFF S., The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policy Makers, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.
  82. [JES 03] JESSOP B., “Governance and metagovernance: on reflexivity, requisite, variety, and requisite irony”, in BANG H.P. (ed.), Governance, as Social and Political Communication, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 2003.
  83. [JON 79] JONAS H., The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1979.
  84. [KAL 80] KALBERG S., “Max Weber types of rationality”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 1145–1179, 1980.
  85. [KAN 79] KANT I., The Conflict of the Faculties, Abaris Books, New York, 1979.
  86. [KAN 97] KANT I., Critique of Practical Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
  87. [KAN 98] KANT I., Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
  88. [KAN 09] KANT I., Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York, 2009.
  89. [KEL 41] KELSEN H., Vergeltung und Kausalität, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1941.
  90. [KEL 43] KELSEN H., Collective and Individual Responsibility in International Law with Particular Regard to the Punishment of War Criminals, 31 Cal. L. Rev. 530, available at: http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol31/iss5/3, 1943.
  91. [KEL 64] KELSEN H., Die Funktion der Verfassung, (Neues) Forum, vol. 132, 1964.
  92. [KEL 05] KELSEN H., Pure Theory of Law, California University Press, Berkeley, 2005.
  93. [KER 15] KERVÉGAN J.F., La raison des normes: essai sur Kant, Vrin, Paris, 2015.
  94. [KRI 80] KRISTEVA J., Powers of Horror. An Essay on Abjection, Columbia University Press, New York, 1982.
  95. [LAC 99] LACAN J., Encore, le Seuil, Paris, 1999.
  96. [LAT 88] LATOUR B., Science in Action, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
  97. [LAV 13] LAVELLE S., SCHIEBER C., SCHNEIDER T., “Ethics and governance of nuclear technology: the case of the long term management of radioactive wastes”, in DORIDOT F., DUQUENOY P., GOUJON P. et al. (eds), Ethical Governance of Emerging Technologies Development, IGI Global, Hershey, 2013.
  98. [LAZ 97] LAZZARATO M., Lavoro Immateriale. Forme di vita e produzione di soggettività, Ombrecorte, Verona, 1997.
  99. [LEE 13] LEE R.G., PETTS J., “Adaptive governance for responsible innovation”, in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  100. [LEG 09] LE GOFF A., Démocratie délibérative et démocratie de contestation. Repenser l’engagement civique entre républicanisme et théorie critique, Université de Paris Ouest-Nanterre, 2009.
  101. [LEN 03] LENOBLE J., MAESSCHALCK M., Toward a Theory of Governance: the Action of Norms, Kluwer Law International, 2003.
  102. [LEN 10] LENOBLE J., MAESSCHALCK M., Democracy, Law and Governance, Ashgate, Farnham, 2010.
  103. [LEV 98] LEVINAS E., Otherwise Than Being or Beyond Essence, Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA, 1998.
  104. [LUN 09] LUND DECLARATION, Conference: new worlds – new solutions, Research and innovation as a basis for developing Europe in a global context, Lund, Sweden, available at: http://www.se2009.eu/polopoly_fs/1.8460!menu/standard/file/lund_declaration_final_version_9_july.pdf, July 7–8 2009.
  105. [MAL 13] MALSCH I., “Responsible innovation in practice – concept and tools”, Philosophia Reformata, vol. 78, pp. 47–63, 2013.
  106. [MAU 00] MAUSS M., The Gift: the Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, Norton & Company, New York, 2000.
  107. [MCI 84] MCINTYRE A., After Virtue: a Study in Moral Theory, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, 1984.
  108. [MEL 09] MELD SHELL S., Kant and the Limits of Autonomy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009.
  109. [MEN 12] MENKE C., Force. A Fundamental Concept of Aesthetic Anthropology, Fordham University Press, New York, 2012.
  110. [MIC 03] MICHAEL B., “Corporate social responsibility in international developments: an overview and critique”, Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Responsibility, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 115–128, 2003.
  111. [MIL 78] MILL J.S., On Liberty, Hackett, Indianapolis, 1978.
  112. [MOY 12] MOYAR J., “Consequentialism and deontology in the philosophy of right”, in BROOKS T. (ed.), Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, Blackwell, Oxford, 2012.
  113. [NAK 11] NAKHIMOVSKY I., The Closed Commercial State. Perpetual Peace and Commercial Society from Rousseau to Fichte, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2011.
  114. [NEU 00a] NEUHOUSER F., Actualizing Freedom: the Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
  115. [NEU 00b] NEUHOUSER F., Foundations of Hegel’s Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
  116. [NOR 91] NORRIE A.W., Law, Ideology and Punishment: Retrieval and Critique of the Liberal Ideal of Criminal Justice, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1991.
  117. [NOR 14] NORDMANN A., “Responsible innovation, the art and craft of future anticipation”, Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 87–98, 2014.
  118. [NOZ 13] NOZICK R., Anarchy, State and Utopia, Basic Books, New York, 2013.
  119. [OWE 13] OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  120. [PAR 91] PARSONS T., “The integration of economic and sociological theory. The Marshall lectures”, Sociological Inquiry, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 10–59, 1991.
  121. [PAR 12] PARSONS T., The Social System Parsons, Routledge, Oxon, 2012.
  122. [PAU 92] PAULSON L.S., “The neo-Kantian dimension of Kelsen’s pure theory of law”, Oxford Legal Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 311–332, 1992.
  123. [PAU 99] PAULSON S., Normativity and Norms: Critical Perspectives on Kelsenian Themes, OUP, Oxford, 1999.
  124. [PAV 14] PAVIE X., SCHOLTEN V., CARTHY D., Responsible Innovation. From Concept to Practice, World Scientific, Singapore, 2014.
  125. [PES 03] PESTRE D., Science, Argent et Politique, Editions Quae, Paris, 2003.
  126. [PIE 09] PIERRE J., “Models of urban governance: the institutional dimension of urban politics”, Urban Affairs Review, vol. 34, p. 372, 1999.
  127. [PIK 14] PIKETTY T., Capital in the Twenty-First Century, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2014.
  128. [RAW 79] RAWLS J., A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1979.
  129. [RAZ 86] RAZ J., The Morality of Freedom, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1986.
  130. [RAZ 14] RAZ J., From Normativity to Responsibility, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014.
  131. [REB 05] REBER B., “Technologies et débat démocratique en Europe. De la participation à l’évaluation pluraliste”, Revue Française de Science Politique, vol. 55, nos. 5–6, pp. 811– 833, 2005.
  132. [REB 13] REBER B., PELLE S., Theoretical landscape, GREAT Project, 2013–2016, available at http://www.great-project.eu/deliverables_files/deliverables03, 2013.
  133. [RIC 00] RICOEUR P., The Just, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 2000.
  134. [RIC 07] RICOEUR P., Reflections on the Just, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 2007.
  135. [RIP 94] RIPSTEIN A., “Universal and general will. Hegel and Rousseau”, Political Theory, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 444–467, 1994.
  136. [RIP 95] RIP A., MISA T., SCHOT J. (eds), Managing Technology in Society: the Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment, Thomson, London, 1995.
  137. [RIP 10] RIPSTEIN A., Force and Freedom: Kant’s Legal and Political Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2010.
  138. [RIT 82] RITTER J., Hegel and the French Revolution. Essays on the Philosophy of Right, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.
  139. [ROC 01] ROCO M.C., BAINBRIDGE W.S. (eds), Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Kluwer, Boston, 2001.
  140. [ROD 95] RODOTÀ S., Tecnologie e diritti, Il Mulino, Bologna, 1995.
  141. [ROS 08] ROSTBOLL C., Deliberative Democracy As Critical Theory, Suny Press, Albany, 2008.
  142. [ROU 68] ROUSSEAU J.J., Social Contract, Penguin Books, London, 1968.
  143. [ROU 79] ROUSSEAU J.J., Emile, Basic Books, New York, 1979.
  144. [SAN 82] SANDEL M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982.
  145. [SAR 93] SARTRE J.P., Being and Nothingness, Washington Square Press, Washington, 1993.
  146. [SCH 34] SCHUMPETER J.A., The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle, translated from the German by Redvers Opie, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick and London, 1934.
  147. [SCH 83] SCHÖN D.A., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Temple Smith, London, 1983.
  148. [SCH 98] SCHNEEWIND J.B., The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
  149. [SCH 11] SCHMIDT AM BUSH C.H., Anerkennung als Prinzip der Kritischen Theorie, De Gruyter, Berlin, 2011.
  150. [SHE 15] SHE FIGURES, Report on gender in research and innovation, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_gender_equality/she_figures_2015-leaflet-web.pdf, 2015.
  151. [SMA 01] SMALL A.W., The Cameralists. The Pioneers of German Social Polity, Batoche Books, Kitchener, 2001.
  152. [SMI 02] SMITH A., The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002.
  153. [SPA 06] SPAAK T., Kelsen and Hart on the Normativity of Law, Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, Stockholm, 2006.
  154. [SPA 15] SPAAPEN J. et al., Indicators for promoting and monitoring responsible research and innovation, EU Commission, available at http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_rri/rri_indicators_final_version.pdf, June 2015.
  155. [STA 13] STAHL C.B., EDEN G., JIROTKA M., “Responsible research and innovation in information and communication technology: identifying and engaging with the ethical implications of ICTs”, in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M., (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  156. [STI 08] STIRLING A., “‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology”, Science Technology and Human Values, vol. 33, pp. 262–294, 2008.
  157. [STI 13] STIGLITZ J., The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future, Norton & Company, New York, 2013.
  158. [STR 14] STREECK W., Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism, Verso, London, 2014.
  159. [SYK 13] SYKES K., MACNAGHTEN P., “Responsible innovation – opening up dialogue and debate”, in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  160. [TAY 84] TAYLOR C., “Foucault on freedom and truth”, Political Theory, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 152–183, 1984.
  161. [TAY 92] TAYLOR C., Sources of the Self: the Making of the Modern Identity, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
  162. [TAY 94] TAYLOR C., Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994.
  163. [VAN 97] VAN EIJNDHOVEN J., “Technology assessment: product of process?”, Technology Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 54, pp. 269–286, 1997.
  164. [VAN 12a] VAN DE POEL I., “The relation between forward-looking and backward looking responsibility”, in VINCENT N., VAN DE POEL I., VAN DEN HOVEN J. (eds), Moral Responsibility, Beyond Free Will & Determinism, Springer, Dordrecht NL, 2012.
  165. [VAN 12b] VAN DEN HOVEN J., LOKHORST G.J.C., VAN DE POEL I., “Engineering and the problem of moral overload”, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2012.
  166. [VAN 13] VAN DEN HOVEN J., “Value sensitive design and responsible innovation”, in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  167. [VAN 14] VAN DER BURG S., “On the hermeneutic need for future anticipation”, Journal of Responsible Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 99–102, 2014.
  168. [VAN 15] VAN DEN HOVEN J., DOORN N., SWIERSTRA T. et al., Responsible Innovation 1. Innovative Solutions for Global Issues, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht, 2014.
  169. [VIN 12] VINCENT N., VAN DE POEL I., VAN DEN HOVEN J. (eds), Moral Responsibility, Beyond Free Will & Determinism, Springer Dordrecht NL, 2012.
  170. [VON 93] VON SCHOMBERG R., Science, Politics, and Morality: Scientific Uncertainty and Decision Making, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993.
  171. [VON 07] VON SCHOMBERG R., From the ethics of technology towards and ethics of knowledge policy, Working Document of the Service of the European Commission, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/ethicsofknowledgepolicy_en.pdf, 2007.
  172. [VON 12] VON SCHOMBERG, “Prospects for technology assessment in a framework of responsible research and innovation”, in DUSSELDORP M., BEECROFt R. (eds), Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, Vs Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2012.
  173. [VON 13] VON SCHOMBERG R., “Vision of responsible research and innovation”, in OWEN R., BESSANT J., HEINTZ M. (eds), Responsible Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2013.
  174. [WAL 06] WALZER M., Passion and Politics: Toward a More Egalitarian Liberalism, Yale University Press, Yale, 2006.
  175. [WIL 82] WILDT A., Autonomie und Anerkennung: Hegels Moralkritik Im Lichte Seiner Fichte-Rezeption, Klett-Cotta Verlag, Stuttgart, 1982.
  176. [WIL 84] WILLIAMS B., Moral Luck, Suny Press, Albany, NY, 1984.
  177. [WIN 87] WYNNE B., Risk Management and Hazardous Waste: Implementation and the Dialectics of Credibility, Springer, Berlin, 1987.
  178. [WIT 73] WITTGENSTEIN L., Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed., Pearson, London, 1973.
  179. [WOL 10] WOLFF VON C., Philosophia Practica Universalis: Methodo Scientifica Pertractata. Praxin Complectens, Qua Omnis Praxeos Moralis Principia Inconcussa Ex Ipsa Animae, Nabu Press, Charlestion, SC, 2010.
  180. [WRI 85] WRIGHT G.H., “Is and ought”, in BULYGIN E. et al. (eds), Man, Law and Modern Forms of Life, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston, 1985.