# Chapter 8

Two Horizontal Dimensions and Seasonality

In this chapter, we consider climate models with a latitude and longitude dependence. This suggests that we find an appropriate basis set for expansions on the sphere. The basis set most often used in this kind of application is the set of spherical harmonics, which are derived in Section 8.3.

## 8.1 Beach Ball Seasonal Cycle

The Beach Ball Model^{1} (North and Coakley, 1979), referred to as BBM, is an intermediate model that falls between one- and two-dimensional energy balance models (EBMs). In this section, we sketch a summary of results of the BBM as a kind of bridge to the full two-dimensional models that will follow. This chapter suggests that extending the EBCM to two horizontal dimensions might be a worthwhile effort. We call it the BBM because it takes the land and ocean borders to be along meridians. The zonally averaged seasonal cycles of the two hemispheres are quite different because the NH has about 40% land and the SH has only 20% land. The plan is to do one model for the NH, fixing the free parameters, then turn to the SH using the same parameters, but different geography, as a test.

When modeling the NH, we take the whole planet to be 40% covered by a single continent with borders pole-to-pole along meridians. The NH model consists of modeling both ocean- and land-seasonal cycles with a longitudinal heat transport term, proportional to the difference between the land temperature at that latitude and time of the year and the corresponding ocean temperature. These terms couple the equations for the land temperature (at that latitude and time of year) to that of the ocean. To compare with data for the NH model, we reflect the NH observed fields across the equator, but lagging the time by 6 months in the opposite hemisphere. In Chapter 6, we found simple expressions for the seasonally dependent insolation function. We also know that Legendre modes 0 and 2 fit the mean annual climate (for either NH or SH, Chapter 5). The main difference between the two hemispheres then comes in the response amplitude and phase lag in the Legendre mode 1, , where is time, with values 0 and 1 at winter solstice, (latitude), and is the present obliquity (tilt of the rotation axis with respect to the orbital plane). The orbit is assumed to be circular in this exercise.

As motivation, consider the representation of the NH winter and spring zonal averages (these correspond also to the summer and fall in the other hemisphere) as depicted in Figure 8.1. Note the quality of fit of the simple mode structure with only the first three modes (index 0, 1, 2) in the expansion into Legendre polynomials. Given the expansion coefficients taken from the data, one can adjust the coupling coefficient between land areas and sea areas to make an excellent fit as shown by the solid curves in Figure 8.1.^{2} This tells us that it should be possible to construct a three-mode seasonal model that will fit this data by adjusting the amplitude of the seasonal mode response (Legendre mode 1) to have the appropriate amplitude and phase lag. Note that in this scheme Legendre modes 0 and 2 are not excited by the sinusoidal time-dependent seasonal cycle of solar heating because those two modes do not have a time dependence.

The model consists of two dependent variables and , the land and ocean surface temperatures averaged around the appropriate segments of their latitude belts. The two energy balance equations are distinguished by the use of and the heat capacities over land and ocean. The governing equation for land is

**8.1**

where the term indicates that the heat is transferred from ocean to land proportionally to the difference in those temperatures at the same latitude, but averaged only over the land fraction (hence, the denominator ). The ocean equation is similar. The temperature as seen in Figure 8.1 is

**8.2**

The three mode amplitudes are governed by the system of equations:

**8.3**

**8.4**

and

**8.5**

By adjusting the value of the land–sea coupling to 0.226 and the heat capacity over land year, one brings the amplitude of to the observed value of 15.5 K. Since the phase lag is about a week too long, one can further reduce to such a value that both the amplitude and phase of match the data. The ocean amplitude is only about 3 K for a value of years and the phase lag is 3 months. Note that for an infinitely deep ocean the phase lag would be a quarter of a cycle and that happens to be 3 months. This says that for our problem of forcing at the 1 year period, this mixed-layer model responds with a phase lag as though the mixed layer were infinitely deep. The seasonal cycle amplitude of the land and/or zonal average temperature is insensitive to the size of .

Further experiments with a symmetrized SH show that the same values of these parameters serve to fit the SH seasonal cycle as well. The BBM is interesting, but suffers from too many choices about the phenomenological (adjustable) parameters. Its success in the examples of North and Coakley (1979) are suggestive that a fully two-dimensional model might just work in simulating the seasonal cycle. Before we undertake this task, we must introduce basis functions that will be useful on the two-dimensional plane and then the spherical surface. These steps form the building blocks and generalize from the Legendre polynomials already considered in previous chapters.

## 8.2 Eigenfunctions in the Bounded Plane

Before tackling the sphere it is useful to solve a simpler eigenvalue problem with less forbidding geometry and with constant heat diffusion coefficient. Imagine our climate to be the temperature distribution on a flat square whose corners are at (0, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1) and (1, 0) in the plane. The appropriate operator for the heat transport term (divergence of heat flux) in an EBM is

**8.6**

We seek the eigenfunctions defined by

subject to boundary conditions that we will take to be zero on the boundaries:

**8.8**

**8.9**

**8.10**

**8.11**

where is an eigenfunction with index and is the corresponding eigenvalue.

We proceed by using the *method of separation of variables*. This consists of making the assumption that the solution for a particular eigenfunction is factorable into a part that is a function only of and a part that is a function only of :

**8.12**

Substituting into (8.7) and dividing by we have

**8.13**

The first term is a function only of and the second is a function only of . The only way these functions can be independent of each other and have this dependence is for each to be equal to a constant. First consider the -dependent term:

**8.14**

where we have taken the separation constant to be , anticipating that it will need to be negative. The solution to this class of ODEs is

**8.15**

where and are arbitrary constants. To fit the boundary conditions, we must have . In addition, we must force to be such that = 0. This can be accomplished by setting where . We then have

**8.16**

where now the index is used to distinguish the fact that we have a separate function for each (positive) integer value of . We can choose the value of to normalize the functions:

**8.17**

Consider next the equation:

**8.18**

where

**8.19**

By applying the same procedure on the boundaries, we find

**8.20**

This implies

**8.21**

where we have replaced the index by the double index to indicate that actually two integers are involved in specifying the eigenvalue. After normalizing both eigenfunctions, we have

**8.22**

Note that these eigenfunctions individually satisfy the boundary conditions and they are orthonormal.

**8.23**

In addition, the eigenfunctions satisfy a condition known as the *completeness relation*:

**8.24**

We note that a two-dimensional problem on a finite domain requires two discrete indices for its specification. It is interesting that there is a *degeneracy* in the eigenvalues, in that two eigenfunctions and have the same eigenvalue: . This degeneracy is traceable to the invariance of the problem under finite rotation about the domain center by 90. Such rotational symmetries always lead to degeneracy of eigenvalues (more than one eigenfunction belonging to the same eigenvalue).

The last two equations imply that an arbitrary reasonably well-behaved (it can have simple discontinuities) function can be expanded into the eigenfunctions:

**8.25**

Knowing the eigenfunctions allows us to solve many boundary value problems on the same domain having the same boundary conditions. For example, the EBM-like problem

**8.26**

( is a constant with dimension (length)) on the square with the same boundary conditions as above (the edges are in contact with a reservoir held at 0 C) can be solved by expanding and the heat source into the eigenfunctions, then multiplying through by and integrating over the square. We are left with an equation for each and :

**8.27**

**8.28**

and finally,

**8.29**

which is the complete solution to the problem. Figure 8.2 shows the first four modal shapes for the square plate.

## 8.3 Eigenfunctions on the Sphere

### 8.3.1 Laplacian Operator on the Sphere

The divergence of heat flux for a linear heat conductor with constant thermal conductivity is the Laplacian operator . In spherical coordinates, this is

**8.30**

Consider now the eigenfunctions of the two-dimensional Laplacian operator

**8.31**

The functions will have to be indexed as we shall soon see. As before, each eigenfunction will have an eigenvalue that will also have an index label. Our strategy will be to assume that can be factored into

**8.32**

We are again using the method of separation of variables. Inserting this form into the defining equation,

**8.33**

Dividing through by leads to

**8.34**

### 8.3.2 Longitude Functions

Note^{3} that the left-hand side is a function only of and the right-hand side is a function only of . The only way this can be so is if each side is a constant, which we set arbitrarily equal to . First consider the right-hand side:

**8.35**

We can now find the solution for

**8.36**

where and are arbitrary constants. Note that in order for to be single valued, *must* be an integer.

### 8.3.3 Latitude Functions

We turn to the longitude-dependent equation that now becomes

**8.37**

It is clear that needs an index that indicates it is for the particular integer . There is yet to come an index associated with the discretization of . Anticipating the result, we set .

**8.38**

When appropriately normalized, these are known as the *associated Legendre Functions*.

In finding an explicit form for the associated Legendre functions, the first step is to substitute

**8.39**

After substituting, we arrive finally at the differential equation for :

**8.40**

We proceed as in the last chapter with the assumption that can be written as a power series:

**8.41**

Similar to what we did earlier, after some manipulation, we arrive at the recursion formula for the coefficients :

**8.42**

Hence, if and are provided, the rest of the coefficients are determined. As before, we encounter the divergence problem unless the numerator above cuts off at some level so that the rest of the terms vanish and becomes a finite-degree polynomial. We find that this will happen if . In other words, must be an integer larger than or equal to . We break up the functions into odd- or even-order polynomials, depending upon whether is odd or even. When it is even, we choose and proceed to have an even polynomial. When is odd, we set and proceed to have an odd-order polynomial. We now have a prescription for finding the . Hence, we may write

**8.43**

By convention, we simplify the notation further by letting run from to , then we can also define the , and we must then restrict . This allows us to write

**8.44**

Note that the normalization can be chosen such that

**8.45**

It is possible to show by direct substitution into the defining differential equation the important rule

**8.46**

If we employ Rodrigues' formula for the ,

**8.47**

we can show

**8.48**

which leads to evaluation of the aforementioned proportionality coefficient:

**8.49**

It is possible to derive an orthogonality relation for the when the values agree:

**8.50**

## 8.4 Spherical Harmonics

We define the functions^{4}

**8.51**

where we have used the shorthand notation to stand for the point on the sphere corresponding to . From this definition, we can establish

**8.52**

### 8.4.1 Orthogonality

Normalization and orthogonality conditions are then

**8.53**

where we have used the further shorthand notation , the element of solid angle on the Earth's surface. Another important relation is the *completeness* relation:

**8.54**

The first few spherical harmonics are

Figure 8.3 shows contour maps of the real and imaginary parts of .

### 8.4.2 Truncation

The truncation level of an eigenfunction expansion usually can be associated with a level of smoothing. In the case of a spherical harmonic expansion on the sphere, we have two indices and representing longitudinal and latitudinal levels in the series. There are good reasons to truncate the series at some value of , the *degree* of the spherical harmonic at the end of the series. This is known as *triangular truncation*. It is indicated schematically in Figure 8.4a. Also shown in Figure 8.4b is a truncation known as *rhomboidal truncation*. This latter truncation was used in some early numerical models of the atmosphere. Nearly all spherical harmonic representations are truncated in the triangular form today.

Figure 8.5 gives a further idea of the way spatial scales are included in a T3 truncation. Note in the figure the different phasing between the imaginary part in the top row of components. The vertical column entries at are just the Legendre polynomials.

## 8.5 Solution of the EBM with Constant Coefficients

We are now in a position to solve the energy balance equation on the sphere when the coefficients are not functions of position. We consider the spherical harmonic series expansion

**8.55**

The energy balance equation reads

**8.56**

where now we have allowed for the possibility of and to depend on and . Inserting the Laplace series expansion, we have

**8.57**

where

**8.58**

The special case for which the time dependence of and is suppressed leads to the equilibrium solution,

**8.59**

If we perturb the solution from equilibrium, we find the interesting result for uncoupled exponential decay modes with time constants given by

**8.60**

In other words, the decay time for mode depends only on the degree and not on the longitudinal wave number .

## 8.6 Introducing Geography

In this section, we briefly introduce the geographical input that we will use extensively later. Consider the possibility that the heat capacity density depends upon position on the globe, . It is reasonable that depends strongly on whether the surface type is continental or oceanic. For an all-land planet we have seen that in many applications, the time constant can be taken to be about 30 days, as that is roughly equivalent to taking about half of the Earth's atmospheric mass into account. On the other hand, over ocean, heat mixes very quickly (few days) down to a depth of about 80 m. This means that the amount of mass involved is about 60 times as much as in the atmosphere alone. One way to account for geography in these models is to let take on these drastically different magnitudes depending upon the local surface type. Let us take days over land surfaces and years over oceanic surfaces. This leads to a strongly position-dependent step function at the continental borders all around the spherical surface. A handy way to incorporate this in our formulation is to expand in a Laplace series

**8.61**

where is the *triangular truncation degree*. By not carrying the sum to and truncating it at a finite level, we have effectively smoothed out some of the sharp edges in the function – the truncation acts like a smoothing filter, excluding features smaller than a certain size inversely proportional to (recall that is the number of zeros from pole to pole in ). Figure 8.6 shows contour maps of at two different degrees of truncation. There is some arbitrariness in the way one truncates a Laplace series. In atmospheric science, there have appeared two truncation conventions: the rhomboidal and the triangular. The triangular is easiest as it is the one we have used in the previous sections.

**8.62**

is known as *triangular truncation* at degree or simply . Most atmosphere/ocean climate model simulations cited in the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports require at least a resolution of T84. Typical weather forecast models at the time of this writing are at T200+. The advantage of triangular truncation is that this truncation preserves some of the rotational symmetry properties associated with the spherical harmonics. For example, under a rotation of the spherical coordinate system, the members of a given multiplet transform into each other. This is a useful property as will be seen in a later chapter on fluctuations on the uniform sphere.

An alternative way of truncating the series that has been utilized in many early general circulation models is the rhomboidal truncation. In this case, we reverse the order of the summation:

**8.63**

We call this *rhomboidal truncation at level* or simply . The two methods of summation are compared in the diagram in Figure 8.4. The advantage of rhomboidal truncation has been mostly computational. The length of the columns in the figure are clearly equal in this scheme and this has been useful in efficiently vectorizing some computer algorithms in the numerical solutions.

## 8.7 Global Sinusoidal Forcing

Consider the two-dimensional EBM forced by a sinusoidal forcing function in time by modifying the outgoing radiation constant term:

**8.64**

This is similar to a global forcing by such an agent as greenhouse gas forcing, but we will allow it to be sinusoidal in time. Similarly to an engineer probing a black box, we drive the electrodes of the box with a sinusoidal forcing and study the response amplitude and phase lag. We can insert this forcing into our governing equation and as the temperature responds at the same frequency as the forcing,

**8.65**

with a complex function of position only. After canceling the common exponential factor, we have

**8.66**

This means that each frequency component of the temperature field is uncoupled from every other one. On the other hand, we now find that because of the presence of the spatial dependence of , the situation is much more complicated than in the rotationally invariant cases studied in previous sections. Inserting the Laplace series for and , we obtain

**8.67**

Now, on multiplying through by and integrating over the sphere, we encounter some new objects:

**8.68**

the so-called *spherical harmonic coupling coefficients*. The result is

**8.69**

where the coupling matrix is given by

**8.70**

In principle, the matrix has an inverse so that, formally,

**8.71**

or, in more compact form,

**8.72**

This is the formal solution to the problem. The matrix has to be computed by first obtaining from a map of the land–sea geography, then it must be expanded into the and finally this must be combined with values of the (from readily available tables or computer algorithms). The matrix also depends on the driving frequency . Since the complex element appears explicitly, the matrix is a complex matrix that has to be inverted on a computer. Once the geography is set, the list are fixed once and for all. The are only computed once and stored. However, the linear weighting of these in the computation of will depend on forcing frequency , requiring that be reinverted for each experiment .

Once the complex amplitude has been computed, we must recompose the Laplace series to obtain the complex function . The magnitude or modulus of this function tells us the amplitude of the response at the point on the Earth. The phase of the complex function at tells us the phase lag in radians behind the forcing phase.

It is instructive to examine the behavior of the amplitude of the response as a function of position on the Earth at different forcing frequencies. Figure 8.7 shows response amplitude maps for four different frequencies (indicated by their periods). The amplitude of the forcing was chosen such that it corresponds roughly to a doubling of ( W m). The equilibrium response () to this forcing should be about . Figure 8.7a indicates that the amplitude is large over the large continental interiors because the thermal inertia () is smaller in those locations. As the period of the forcing is increased (Figure 8.7b–d), the amplitude of the response becomes more uniform over the globe. The relevant parameter is the relaxation time of the particular surface compared to the period of the forcing. Observe that the length scale in the response field increases with longer periods of forcing.

## 8.8 Two-Dimensional Linear Seasonal Model

The two-dimensional model can be formulated as in the previous chapter, only here we allow for the spatial dependence of thermal diffusion, . We make Laplace–Fourier expansions of the quantities

**8.73**

**8.74**

**8.75**

**8.76**

**8.77**

for insertion into the EBM

**8.78**

This model has been solved (North *et al*., 1983; Hyde *et al*., 1989) and the solutions recovered by the very same technique as in the last chapter except that the model must be solved separately for each temporal harmonic . Once the mode amplitudes , have been found by inverting the response matrix for each , the solution field can be recomposed from the aforementioned.

### 8.8.1 Adjustment of Free Parameters

The model now has several new parameters whose values must be determined by fitting to the present seasonal cycle. The diffusion parameter has the form (Mengel *et al*., 1988)

**8.79**

Different values of the parameters , and have been used in different publications over the years. The function is plotted in Figure 8.8 with the solid line representing the thermal conductivity used by Mengel *et al*. (1988) and Kim and North (1992) and the short dashed curve is form used by Graves *et al*. (1993). The long-dashed line is the constant value used in Chapter 5 in fitting the one dimensional model. The coefficients , and had to be adjusted to give a reasonable fit to the present seasonal cycle. One conjecture is that the diffusion parameter has to be larger in the tropics to account for the larger vapor pressure of water there and the increased efficiency of the Hadley cell (Lindzen and Farrell, 1977).

Another problem with the simulations is that the Arctic Ocean is mostly covered with sea ice. This has the heat capacity of neither land nor sea. Hence, we must introduce another step in the step function to account for the fact that sea ice has puddles, open cracks (leads), and other features that are not easily modeled in the linear form we have taken. Nevertheless, we attempt to take these into account in the present context by simply assigning those areas with perennial sea ice to have a value of . This last value came from adjusting its magnitude until the annual harmonic of the surface temperature field came into agreement with the data.

## 8.9 Present Seasonal Cycle Comparison

The next three subsections contain discussions on how the model simulates the annual and semiannual harmonics of the surface temperature field. In these simulations, the seasonal cycle forcing includes the important semiannual harmonic contribution to the second Legendre polynomial mode . This term makes an important contribution especially near the equator over which the Sun passes twice a year. It also contributes significantly in the polar regions where there is perpetual darkness in winter and perpetual daylight in summer. The convergence of the Fourier–Laplace series is slow in the polar regions because of the discontinuous derivative at the latitude of perpetual day (or night). Including this additional term improves the behavior in those regions.

### 8.9.1 Annual Cycle

The amplitude of the annual cycle agrees well with the smoothed data as seen in Figure 8.9. The agreement is especially noteworthy over the two Northern Hemisphere continents. It is interesting that the data indicate a hint of the Himalayan plateau but the model has no such feature because no allowance is made in this model for topography. The agreement is also good in and around Antarctica. The tiny 1 K amplitude curves in the tropics show some conformity with the observations. The overall coincidence of the contours with the continental boundaries is indicative of the very strong influence of the land–sea contrast in heat capacity. The phase lag is more sensitive to local geography and it is not mimicked as well as seen in Figure 8.10. First, the phase lag in the tropics should be ignored as the annual harmonic is very small in the model and in the data. The phase lag of about or less than 30 days in the interior of each Northern Hemisphere continent is very good except for some details. In North America, the 30 days contour is obviously influenced by the Rocky Mountain chain. There is similar disagreement that is easily explained over the mountains in South America (both due to shorter lags over high terrain). A similar high plateau erroroccurs over the Himalayas. Agreement over the ocean is moderate, being more extreme in the model regarding the quarter cycle (90 days) lag. We conclude that the annual cycle is modeled rather well except for some features that are not expected to be faithfully represented in such a comparison.

### 8.9.2 Semiannual Cycle

The first thing to notice about the semiannual cycle as shown in Figure 8.11 is how small it is. This is indicative of the rapid convergence of the Fourier series representing the seasonal surface temperature field. Over ocean surfaces, it is smaller than 1 K except in polar regions, where, as noted above, it feels the second harmonic forcing from the polar day/night term. This same day/night forcing of the amplitude over polar regions, especially Antarctica, leads to large responses over both model and data.

## 8.10 Chapter Summary

The expansion of EBCMs from one to two dimensions on the spherical surface was first motivated by a discussion of the BBM, which is a planet with continents whose borders are pole to pole along meridians. This led to a model that is symmetric across the equator. An EBCM was concocted that mimicked a symmetrized NH. The effective heat capacities of land and sea along with a parameter that coupled ocean and land temperatures at the same latitudes could be adjusted to form a seasonal cycle of the model that agreed with the seasonal cycle of observations. The fact that the data could be well represented by three Legendre polynomial modes (), where the seasonal cycle is carried only by mode index unity, and that mode was sinusoidal in time suggested that this simple approach was on the right track. Unfortunately, the BBM required too many adjustable parameters for it to be useful.

The next step was clearly to try allowing the heat capacity to be a function of position on the sphere: . Before building the model, we introduced two-dimensional eigenfunctions of the Laplace operator (), first on a plane square then onto the sphere, where we encounter the spherical harmonics. Spherical harmonics turn out to be the modal shapes of the EBCM if the heat capacity function is not a function of position. When it is a function of position, we must resort to numerical methods. This has been carried out by many studies over the last three decades by a number of different numerical approaches (North *et al*., 1983; Hyde *et al*., 1989; Bowman and Huang, 1991; Kim and North, 1991; Stevens and North, 1996; North and Wu, 2001; Zhuang *et al*., 2014).

The solutions to the two-dimensional model, as shown, were obtained by analyzing the model and data into mean annual, annual harmonic, and semi-nnual harmonic as a function of position. The Fourier series of these harmonics converges very rapidly so that only these few harmonics are necessary to obtain a very good representation of both model and data. The shape of the annual cycle fits the data extremely well with large amplitude over land masses and smaller ones over the ocean surfaces. The phase lag between insulation and response of the annual harmonic is only about 1 month over the interiors of the large continents and roughly three months over the ocean surfaces. While some details differ, the gross features of the phase lag are captured. The semiannual harmonic amplitude is also in very good agreement with the data with very small amplitude ( K) over most of the globe but larger as one approaches either pole.

The general success of the two-dimensional EBCM suggests that it might be good enough for some applications in paleoclimatology and others such as designing observational networks or in detection of climate signals. Given the success of the two-dimensional EBCM in simulating the seasonal cycle,we push the two-dimensional EBCM to include random (weather noise) forcing.

## Notes for Further Reading

The book by Washington and Parkinson (2005) discusses spherical harmonics in the context of three-dimensional climate models, as well as numerical methods for general circulation models. Most books on mathematical physics such as Arfken and Weber (2005) discuss linear boundary value problems and the use of spherical harmonics and other special functions.

## Exercises

**8.1****a.**Show that the eigenvalue problem- allows a solution in the form
- Determine the corresponding eigenvalue.
**b.**Determine the solution of- with boundary conditions

**8.2**Show that the solution ofwith boundary conditions

is given by

where

**8.3**Prove by deduction that**8.4**The Poisson equation in spherical coordinates is give bywhere is longitude and is latitude. Boundary conditions are given by

Obtain a zonally symmetric solution of the Poisson equation.

**8.5**Consider the Laplace equation in spherical coordinates:where is longitude, is co-latitude, and is radius.

**a.**Assuming a separable solution, , rewrite the Laplace equation above in terms of the separable solution.**b.**Let us assume a radial solution in the form , rewrite the governing equation in Part (a).**c.**Set up the equation for a zonally symmetric solution. Solve the resulting problem.**d.**Without the assumption of zonal symmetry, a separable solution of the equation in Part (b) can be written as . Use the result in Part (c), set up the governing equation for each component of the separable solution. Obtain the longitudinal component of the solution.**e.**Let us assert that the solution for the latitudinal component of the equation is given by- where is called the
*associated Legendre function*of order and rank . Prove that the associated Legendre function satisfies latitudinal component of the Laplace equation.

**8.6**Legendre functions are generated by usingwhich is known as the

*Rodrigues' formula*. Using the formula, generate the Legendre polynomials up to order 4 ().**8.7**For this problem, use the Rodrigues' formula in Exercise 8.6 and the definition of associated Legendre functions in Exercise 8.5.**a.**Develop the Rodrigues' formula for associated Legendre functions.**b.**Show that the associated Legendre functions with a negative rank defined by- satisfies
**c.**Using the Rodrigues' formula in Parts (a) and (b), derive the associated Legendre functions for up to order .

**8.8**Spherical harmonic basis functions are the solutions of Laplace equations in spherical coordinates. As discussed in Exercises 8.4 and 8.5, a most general solution is given bywhere

is called the

*spherical harmonics*of order and rank . Any horizontal spatial patterns (at the same elevation ) can be decomposed in terms of spherical harmonic basis functions.**a.**Show that**b.**Consider an equilibrium solution of a two-dimensional EBM for a perpetual January 1 simulation with a constant albedo:- where is a unit vector pointing from the center of the planet to a point on the surface, the insolation distribution function is at its perpetual configuration and , and are simply constants. Set up an EBM equation by using spherical harmonics and obtain a closed-form solution.