References – Information Services and Digital Literacy

References

References

Aberbach, J.D., Christensen, T. Citizens and consumers. Public Management Review. 2005; 7(2):225–246.

Agamben, G. Stato di eccezione. Torino: Bollati Bolinghieri; 2003.

Agarwal, N.K., Xu, Y.C., Poo, D.C.C. A context-based investigation into source use by information seekers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 62(6):1087–1104.

Agosto, D.E., Abels, E.G., Rozaklis, L., MacDonald, C. ‘The future of reference and information services in a virtual world’, in Proceedings of the 2009 ASIS&T [American Society for Information Science and Technology] Annual Meeting. Canada: Vancouver; 2009.

Akerlof, G. The market for "lemons": quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1970; 84(3):488–500.

Akin, L. Information overload and children: a survey of Texas elementary school students. School Library Media Quarterly Online. 1998; 1:1–11.

Allen, D. Information behavior and decision making in time-constrained practice: a dual-processing perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 62(11):2165–2181.

Almeida, M., Souza, R., Fonseca, F. Semantics in the semantic web: a critical evaluation. Knowledge Organization. 2011; 38(3):187–203.

Anderson, C. The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less or More. New York: Hyperion; 2006.

Anderson, J.Q., Rainie, L. The Future of the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2009.

Anderson, T.D. Uncertainty in action: observing information seeking within the creative processes of scholarly research. Information Research. 12(1), 2006.

Andersson, J. Det dumma nätet. In: Andersson J., Snickars P., eds. Efter the Pirate Bay. Stockholm: Kungliga Biblioteket; 2010:49–72.

Antoni, R., Svenska läsvanorHolmberg, S., Weibull, L., eds. Du Stora Nya Varld. SOM Institutet, Goteborgs Universitet, Goteborg, 2006:323–334.

Arch, X. Creating the academic library folksonomy. College & Research Libraries News. 2007; 68(2):80.

Arora, P. Online social sites as virtual parks: an investigation into leisure online and offline. The Information Society. 2011; 27(2):113–120.

Auletta, K. Googled: The End of World As We Know It. London: Virgin Books; 2010.

Baker, D., Combining the best of both worlds: the hybrid library Digital Convergence:. D. Baker. Springer, London, 2007:95–105. [Libraries of the Future.].

Bambauer, D.E. Shopping badly: cognitive biases, communications, and the fallacy of the marketplace of ideas. University of Colorado Law Review. 2006; 77:649–709.

Barnett, J., Coulson, M., Foreman, N. Examining player anger in World of Warcraft. In: Bainbridge W.S., ed. Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual. London: Springer-Verlag; 2010:147–160.

Barzilai-Nahon, K. Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: a framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008; 59(9):1493–1512.

Battelle, J. The Search: How Google and its Rivals Rewrote the Rules of Business and Transformed our Culture. New York: Portfolio; 2005.

Bauman, Z. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity; 2000.

Bauman, Z. Consuming Life. Cambridge: Polity; 2007.

Bauwens, M., The political economy of peer production CTheory: 1000 Days of Theory, 12 January., 2005. Available at: http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499

Bawden, D. Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of documentation. 2001; 57(2):218–259.

Bawden, D. Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In: Lankshear C., Knobel M., eds. Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York: Peter Lang; 2008:17–32.

Bawden, D. Smoother pebbles and the shoulders of giants: the developing foundations of information science. Journal of Information Science. 2008; 34(4):415–426.

Bawden, D., Robinson, L. The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies. Journal of Information Science. 2009; 35(2):180–191.

Baym, N., ‘This song’s for you’. keynote, Internet Research 11.0 Conference, 23 October. Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.

Benjamin, W. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. London: Penguin; 2008.

Benkler, Y. Coase’s Penguin, or Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal. 2002; 112(3):367–445.

Benkler, Y. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2006.

Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L. The digital natives debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2008; 39(5):775–786.

Bentivegna, S. Disuguaglianze digitali: le nuove forme di esclusione nella societa dell’informazione. Roma and Bari: Editori Laterza; 2009.

Berk, R.A. Teaching strategies for the net generation. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal. 2009; 3(2):1–23.

Berners-Lee, T. Long live the web: a call for continued open standards and neutrality. December: Scientific American; 2010.

Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O. The semantic web. Scientific American. 2001; 284(5):28–37.

Bernier, A. Representations of youth in local media: implications for library service. Library & Information Science Research. 2011; 33(2):158–167.

Biagioli, M. Documents of documents: scientists’ names and scientific claims. In: Riles A., ed. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2006:127–157.

Björneborn, L. Serendipity dimensions and users’ information behaviour in the physical library interface. Information Research. 13(4), 2008.

Bohman, J., Expanding dialogue: the Internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracyCrossley, N., Roberts, J.M., eds. After Habermas: New Perspectives on the Public Sphere. Blackwell, Oxford; Malden, MA, 2004:131–155.

Boland, R.J., Tenkasi, R.V. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science. 1995; 6(4):350–372.

Bolter, J.D., Grusin, R. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999.

Bonfadelli, H. The Internet and knowledge gaps. European Journal of Communication. 2002; 17(1):65–84.

Borgman, C.L. From Gutenberg to the Global Information Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press; 2000.

Borgmann, A. Orientation in technological space. First Monday. 15(6–7), 2010.

Borlund, P. The concept of relevance in IR. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2003; 54(10):913–925.

Bouwman, M.J., Frishkoff, P.A., Frishkoff, P. ‘How do financial analysts make decisions? A process model of the investment screening decision’, Accounting. Organizations and Society. 1987; 12(1):1–29.

Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2000.

boyd, D.M., Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics PhD thesis. University of California, Berkeley, 2008. [Berkeley, CA.].

Brandtzaeg, P.B., Heim, J., Karahasanovic, A. Understanding the new digital divide: a typology of internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2011; 69(3):123–138.

Breslin, J.G., Passant, A., Decker, S. The Social Semantic Web. Berlin: Springer; 2009.

Brewer, E. The consumer side of search. Communications of the ACM. 2009; 45(9):41.

Briers, M., Chua, W.F. ‘The role of actor-networks and boundary objects in management accounting change: a field study of an implementation of activity-based costing’, Accounting. Organizations and Society. 2001; 26(3):237–269.

Briggs, A., Burke, P. A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet, 3rd ed. Oxford: Polity; 2010.

Brin, S., Page, L. The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems. 1998; 30(1–7):107–117.

Brooks, D., The protocol society The New York Times, A41, 22 December. Available at:, 2009. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/22/opinion/22brooks.html

Bruce, C., Edwards, S., Lupton, M. Six frames for information literacy education: a conceptual framework for interpreting the relationships between theory and practice. Italics. 5(1), 2006.

Bruce, H. Personal, anticipated information need. Information Reseach. 10(3), 2005.

Bruns, A. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang; 2008.

Bruns, A., News blogs and citizen journalism: new directions for e-journalism e-Journalism: New Media and News Media. K. Prasad. BR Publishing, Delhi, 2009:101–126.

Bruns, A., Schmidt, J.-H. Produsage: a closer look at continuing developments. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 2011; 17(1):3–7.

Brynolf, H. Twitter Census: En Rapport om Twitter i Sverige. Stockholm: Intellecta; 2011.

Bryson, J., Managing Information Services: A Transformational Approach Aldershot. VT: Ashgate, Burlington, 2006.

Buckingham, D. Defining digital literacy: what do young people need to know about digital media? Digital Kompetanse. 2006; 1(4):263–276.

Buckingham, D. Defining digital literacy: what young people need to know about digital media. In: Bachmair B., ed. Medienbildung in neuen Kulturräumen: die deutschsprachige und britische Diskussion. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2010:59–71.

Buckland, M.K. Information as thing. Journal of the American Society of Information Science. 1991; 42(5):351–360.

Buckland, M.K. Reference library service in the digital environment. Library & Information Science Research. 2008; 30(2):81–85.

Bumiller, E. We have met the enemy and he is PowerPoint. New York Times, 26. (April):2010.

Burke, P. A Social History of Knowledge: From Gutenberg to Diderot. Cambridge: Polity; 2001.

Burke, P., Briggs, A. A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to the Internet, 2nd ed. Oxford: Polity; 2005.

Buschman, J.E., Conclusion: just how critical should librarianship be of technology? Information Technology in Librarianship: New Critical Approaches. Westport, CN: Libraries Unlimited:. G.J. Leckie, J. Buschman, . 2009:281–288.

Bush, V. As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly. 1945; 176(1):101–108.

Butterfield, D.S., Fake, C., Henderson-Begg, C.J., Mourachov, S. ‘Interestingness ranking of media objects’, patent application. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/5u8MP6ZJu, 2006.

Byström, K. The effects of task complexity on the relationship between information types acquired and information sources used. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research. 2000; 1:85–101.

Byström, K., Hansen, P. Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2005; 56(10):1050–1061.

Byström, K., Järvelin, K. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management. 1995; 31(2):191–213.

Caille A., ed. La quête de reconnaissance nouveau phénoméne social total. Paris: La Découverte amd MAUSS, 2007.

Callahan, E.S., Herring, S.C. Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 62(10):1899–1915.

Capurro, R., Towards an information ecologyWormell I., ed. Information Quality: Definitions and Dimensions. Proceedings of the NORDINFO International seminar ‘Information and Quality’, Royal School of Librarianship, Copenhagen, 23–25 August 1989. Taylor Graham, London, 1990:122–139. http://www.capurro.de/nordinf.htm [Available at:].

Cardon, D., ‘Le design de la visibilité: un essai de typologie du web 2.0’, InternetActu.net Available at:, 2008. http://www.Internetactu.net/2008/02/01/le-design-de-la-visibilite-un-essai-de-typologie-du-web-20/

Carlile, P.R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science. 2002; 13(4):442–455.

Case, D.O. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behaviors. San Diego: Academic Press; 2002.

Case, D.O. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior, 2nd ed. Burlington, MA: Academic Press; 2007.

Casey, M., Savastinuk, L., Library 2.0: A Guide to Participatory Library Service Medford, NJ: Information Today., 2007.

Casey, M.E., Savastinuk, L.C. Library 2.0. Library Journal, 9. (January):2006.

Castells, M. Communication Power. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

Chartier, R. Forms and Meanings: Texts, Performances, and Audiences from Codex to Computer. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1995.

Chatman, E.A. The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1996; 47(3):193–206.

Chatman, E.A. A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1999; 50(3):207–217.

Checkland, P. Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 2000; 17(1):11–58.

Cheng, R., Vassileva, J. ‘User motivation and persuasion strategy for peer-to-peer communities’, in Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society:. 2005; 7:193–201.

Chesney, T., Su, D.K.S. The impact of anonymity on weblog credibility. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2010; 68(10):710–718.

Choo, C.W. Information use and early warning effectiveness: perspectives and prospects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2009; 60(5):1071–1082.

Christensen, C. Twitter revolutions? Addressing social media and dissent. The Communication Review. 2011; 14(3):155–157.

Christensen, C.M. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms To Fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1997.

Chu, D. In search of prosumption: youth and the new media in Hong Kong. First Monday. 15(2), 2010.

Chung, D.S., Yi, K. Distribution of news information through social bookmarking: an examination of shared stories in the Delicious website. Information Research. 14(3), 2009.

Clark, C., Dugdale, G. Young People’s Writing: Attitudes, Behaviour and the Role of Technology. London: National Literacy Trust; 2009.

Clark, C., Hawkins, L. Young People’s Reading: The Importance of the Home Environment and Family Support. London: National Literacy Trust; 2010.

Clarke, A.C. Peacetime uses for V2. Wireless World:. 58, 1945.

Cohen, H., Morley, R., Dallow, P., Kaufmann, L., Database narratives: conceptualising digital heritage databases in remote aboriginal communities. [Proceedings of the] Information Visualisation International Conference on O. 2010:422–427.

Cohen, N., ‘When knowledge isn’t written, does it still count?’ New York Times, 7 August. Available at:, 2011. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/08/business/media/a-push-to-redefine-knowledge-at-wikipedia.html?_r=1

Cohen, S. Folk Devils and Moral Panics. London: MacGibbon & Kee; 1972.

Connaway, L.S., Dickey, T.J., The Digital Information Seeker: Report of the Findings from Selected OCLC, RIN, and JISC User Behaviour Projects Bristol: JISC; Dublin, OH: OCLC Research., 2010.

Connaway, L.S., Dickey, T.J., Radford, M.L. If it is too inconvenient I’m not going after it: convenience as a critical factor in information-seeking behaviors. Library & Information Science Research. 2011; 33(3):179–190.

Connaway, L.S., Radford, M.L., Dickey, T.J., De Angelis Williams, J., Confer, P. Sense-making and synchronicity: information-seeking behaviors of millennials and baby boomers. Libri. 2008; 58(2):123–135.

Conway, P. Preservation in the age of Google: digitization, digital preservation, and dilemmas. The Library Quarterly. 2010; 80(1):61–79.

Cosijn, E., Ingwersen, P. Dimensions of relevance. Information Processing and Management. 2000; 36(4):533–550.

Cox, A.M., Blake, M.K. Information and food blogging as serious leisure. Aslib Proceedings. 2011; 63(2):204–220.

Cronin, B. Libraries 2000 AD: the skills requirement. In: Millerchip J.J.G., ed. Personal Management Skills. London: Consortium on Financing Higher Education; 1991:1–12.

Cronin, B., Martin, I. Social skills training in librarianship. Journal of Librarianship. 1983; 15(2):105–122.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. Beyond Boredom and Anxiety: Experiencing Flow in Work and Play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 2000.

Cull, B.W. Reading revolutions: online digital text and implications for reading in academe. First Monday. 16(6), 2011.

Davenport, T.H. Information Ecology: Mastering the Information and Knowledge Environment. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997.

Davis, N.Z. The Return of Martin Guerre. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1983.

Davis, P.M. Patterns in electronic journal usage: challenging the composition of geographic consortia. College and Research Libraries. 2002; 63(6):484–498.

Day, R.E. Death of the user: reconceptualizing subjects, objects, and their relations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 62(1):78–88.

DCMS and BIS, Digital Britain: Final Report (2009), Cm 7650 Available at:. Department for Culture, Media and Sport, and Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, 2009. http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/digitalbritain-finalreport-jun09.pdf

de Lange, F.P., van Gaal, S., Lamme, V.A.F., Dehaene, S. How awareness changes the relative weights of evidence during human decision-making. Public Library of Science Biology. 9(11), 2011.

de Paoli, S., Storni, C. Produsage in hybrid networks: sociotechnical skills in the case of Arduino. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 2011; 17(1):31–52.

Dempsey, L. Always on: libraries in a world of permanent connectivity. First Monday. 14(1), 2009.

Denecke, K., Nejdl, W. How valuable is medical social media data? Content analysis of the medical web. Information Sciences. 2009; 179(12):1870–1880.

Denton, W. FRBR and the history of cataloging. In: Taylor A.G., ed. Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tool. Libraries Unlimited: Westport, CT, 2007.

Dervin, B., Frenette, M. Sense-Making Methodology: Communicating Communicatively with Campaign Audiences. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press:. 2003; 233–250.

Devlin, B., Burke, M. Internet: the ultimate reference tool? Internet Research. 1997; 7(2):101–108.

DiMaggio, P., Hargittai, E. ‘From the "digital divide" to "digital inequality": studying internet use as penetration increases’, working paper 47, Princeton University, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/63tuDW4Ye, 2001.

Dixon, J., Involvement in Causes Can Trigger Individual Behavior Changes Available at:. Georgetown University, Center for Social Impact Communication, Arlington, VA, 2011. http://csic.georgetown.edu/227052.html

Dörk, M., Carpendale, S., Williamson, C. ‘The information flaneur: a fresh look at information seeking’, paper given at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. BC, Canada: Vancouver; 2011.

Douglas, M. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Praeger; 1966.

Du, Y. Librarians’ responses to reading at risk: a Delphi study. Library & Information Science Research. 2009; 31(1):46–53.

Duffy, A., Liying, T., Ong, L. Singapore teens’ perceived ownership of online sources and credibility. First Monday. 15(4–5), 2010.

Duranti, L. Concepts and principles for the management of electronic records, or records management theory is archival diplomatics. Records Management Journal. 1999; 9(3):149–171.

Durkheim, É. Le suicide: étude de sociologie. Paris: Presses universitaires de France; 1990.

Dutton, W.H., The Internet and social transformation: reconfiguring access Transforming Enterprise: The Economic and Social Implications of Information Technology. W. Dutton, B. Kahin, R. O’Callaghan, A. Wyckoff. MA: MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005:375–398.

Dutton, W.H., Reconfiguring access to information and expertise in the social sciences: the social shaping and implications of cyberinfrastructure Available at:. presented at the 3rd International Conference on e-Social Science (7–9 October, Ann Arbor, MI), 2007. http://www.ncess.ac.uk/events/conference/2007/papers/paper152.pdf

Dutton, W.H., Through the network of networks: the fifth estate Social Science Research Network. Available at:, 2007. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1134502

Dyson, E. Release 2.1: A Design for Living in the Digital Age. New York: Broadway Books; 1998.

Earnshaw, R., Vince, J. ‘From the information age to the intelligence age: exploiting IT and convergence’, in Digital Convergence: Libraries of the Future. London: Springer; 2007. [241–51].

Ebersbach, A., Glaser, M., Heigl, R., Warta, A. Wiki: Web Collaboration, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2008.

Ek, S., Om Information, Media och Hälsa in en Samhallelig Kontext: En Empirisk och Analytisk Studie PhD thesis, Information Studies,. Åbo Akademi University, Åbo, 2005.

Ekström, A. Google & tidsandan. In: Andersson J., Snickars P., eds. Efter the Pirate Bay. Stockholm: Kungliga Biblioteket; 2010:73–86.

Encyclopaedia Britannica, Fatally Flawed: Refuting the Recent Study on Encyclopedic Accuracy by the Journal Nature Available at:. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc, Chicago, 2006. http://corporate.britannica.com/britannica_nature_response.pdf

Eppler, M.J., Mengis, J. The concept of information overload: a review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society. 2004; 20(5):325–344.

Epstein, D., Nisbet, E.C., Gillespie, T. Who’s responsible for the digital divide? Public perceptions and policy implications. The Information Society. 2011; 27(2):92–104.

Ertzscheid, O., La boutique contre le bazar blog, Affordance. info. Available at:, 2010. http://affordance.typepad.com/mon_weblog/2010/05/la-boutique-contre-le-bazar.html

Ertzscheid, O., Le "like" tuera le lien blog, Affordance.info. Available at:, 2010. http://affordance.typepad.com/mon_weblog/2010/05/le-like-tuera-le-lien.html

Eshet-Alkalai, Y. Digital literacy: a conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia. 2004; 13:93–106.

Eubanks, V. Digital Dead End: Fighting for Social Justice in the Information Age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2011.

Commission, European. Open Access – Opportunities and challenges: A Handbook, EUR 23459. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, European Commission and German Commission for UNESCO; 2008.

European Commission, A digital agenda for Europe Available at: communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels. 2010. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=C0M:2010:0245:FIN:EN:PDF

Evans, W., Building Library 3.0: Issues in Creating a Culture of Participation Oxford: Chandos., 2009.

Facebook, Facebook factsheet Available at:, 2004. http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?factsheet

Fencott, C. ‘Virtual storytelling as narrative potential: towards an ecology of narrative’, in ICVS ’01: Proceedings of the International Conference on Virtual Storytelling: Using Virtual Reality Technologies for Storytelling. London: Springer-Verlag; 2001. [90–9].

Findahl, O. Äldre Svenskar och Internet. Stockholm: Stiftelsen för Internetinfrastruktur; 2010.

Fisher, T. ‘The future digital economy digital content: creation, distribution and access’, dinner speech, Conference on the Future Digital Economy: Digital Content Creation, Distribution and Access, 30 January. Rome: OECD; 2006.

Flaxbart, D. Conversations with chemists: information-seeking behavior of chemistry faculty in the electronic age. Science and Technology Libraries. 2001; 21(3/4):5–26.

Florida, R.L. The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books; 2002.

Florida, R.L. The world is spiky: globalization has changed the economic playing field but hasn’t leveled it. October: The Atlantic Monthly; 2005. [48–51].

Foster, A. Battening down the hatches: the Business Information Survey 2009. Business Information Review. 2009; 26(1):10–27.

Foucault, M., ‘Qu’est-ce qu’un auteur?’ Dits et Écrits, vol. 1. M. Foucault. Gallimard, Paris, 1994:789–821.

Friedman, T.L. The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2005.

Fu, W.-T., Gray, W.D. Suboptimal tradeoffs in information seeking. Cognitive Psychology. 2006; 52(3):195–242.

Fujimura, J.H. Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects, and translation. In: Pickering A., ed. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992:168–211.

Gal, U., Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J. ‘The dynamics of boundary objects, social infrastructures and social identities’, Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Environments. Systems and Organizations. 2004; 4(4):193–206.

Gantz, J., Reinsel, D., The Digital Universe Decade: Are You Ready? EMC Corporation Available at:, 2010. http://www.emc.com/collateral/demos/microsites/idc-digital-universe/iview.htm

Garrety, K., Badham, R. The politics of socio-technical intervention: an interactionist view. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2000; 12(1):103–118.

Gazan, R. Social annotations in digital library collections. D-Lib Magazine. 14(11/12), 2008.

Gensollen, M. La culture entre économie et écologie: l’exemple des communautés en ligne. In: Greffe X., ed. Creation et diversite au miroir des industries culturelles. Paris: La Documentation Francaise; 2006:285–312.

Gensollen, M. Information goods and online communities. In: Brousseau E., Curien N., eds. Internet and Digital Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007:173–201.

Gibson, J.J. The Perception of the Visual World. New York: Houghton Mifflin; 1950.

Gibson, W. Neuromancer. London: Gollancz; 1984.

Giger, P., Participation Literacy: Part I: Constructing the Web 2.0 Concept Licentiate thesis,. Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Technoculture, Humanities and Planning, Karlskrona, 2006.

Giles, J. Internet encyclopaedias go head to head. Nature. 2005; 438(7070):900–901.

Giles, J. Wikipedia rival calls in the experts. Nature. 2006; 443(7111):493.

Gillespie, T. ‘The politics of "platforms"’. New Media & Society. 2010; 12(3):347–364.

Gilliland-Swetland, A.J., Enduring Paradigm, New Opportunities: The Value of the Archival Perspective in the Digital Environment Available at:. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC, 2000. http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub89/pub89.pdf

Gillmor, D., We the Media – Grassroots Journalism by the People, for the People. O’Reilly, Sebastopol, 2004. Available at http://www.authorama.com/we-the-media-1.html

Gilster, P.Digital Literacy. New York: Wiley, 1997.

Ginzburg, C.Il formaggio e i vermi: il cosmo di un mugnaio del ’500. Torino: G. Einaudi, 1976.

Giorgi, L., Redclift, M. European environmental research in the social sciences: research into ecological modernization as a "boundary object". European Environment. 2000; 10(1):12–23.

Goh, D.H.-L., Lee, C.S. An analysis of tweets in response to the death of Michael Jackson. Aslib Proceedings. 2011; 63(5):432–444.

Golbeck, J., Grimes, J.M., Rogers, A. Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010; 61(8):1612–1621.

Goody, J.The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

Google Corporate Information: Company Overview. 1998 Available at: http://www.google.com/corporate/

Government of Canada Improving Canada’s Digital Advantage. 2010 digital economy consultation paper. Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/68x9hUpZI

Grace, H. "General aesthesia": mutations of value and cognition in new media practices. The Information Society. 2010; 26(4):256–265.

Graham, M. Time machines and virtual portals: the spatialities of the digital divide. Progress in Development Studies. 2011; 11(3):211–227.

Granovetter, M. Threshold models of collective behavior. The American Journal of Sociology. 1978; 83(6):1420–1443.

Grossberg, L. Cultural studies, modern logics, and theories of globalisation. In: McRobbie A., ed. Back to Reality?: Social Experience and Cultural Studies. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1997:7–35.

Grossberg, L.Cultural Studies in the Future Tense. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.

Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the rationalization of society; vol. 1. Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.

Habermas, J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason; vol. 2. Beacon Press, Boston, 1984.

Habermas, J. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991.

Hager, P., Beckett, D. Philosophical underpinnings of the integrated conception of competence. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 1995; 27(1):1–24.

Haider, J., Sundin, O. Beyond the legacy of the Enlightenment? Online encyclopaedias as digital heterotopias. First Monday. 15(1), 2010.

Halavais, A. Search Engine Society. Cambridge: Polity; 2008.

Halpern, D. Social Capital. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity; 2005.

Hanifi, R. Suomalaiset luottavat klassikoihin. Helsinki, Statistikcentralen, 2007. Available at http://www.tilastokeskus.fi/artikkelit/2007/art_2007-06-15_004.html

Hansson, J. Chantal Mouffe’s theory of agonistic pluralism and its relevance for library and information science research. In: Leckie G.J., Given L.M., Buschman J., eds. Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited; 2010:249–257.

Haras, C. Information behaviors of Latinos attending high school in East Los Angeles. Library & Information Science Research. 2011; 33(1):34–40.

Hardin, R.Indeterminacy and Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003.

Hardin, R.How Do You Know? The Economics of Ordinary Knowledges. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009.

Hargittai, E. Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review. 2005; 23(3):371–379.

Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., Thomas, K.Y. Trust online: young adults’ evaluation of web content. International Journal of Communication. 2010; 4:468–494.

Harman, G. Technology, objects and things in Heidegger. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 2010; 34(1):7–25.

Harris, F.J., Library FAIL: digital expectations, legacy institutions. Proceedings of the LID A 2010: Libraries in the Digital Age, University of Zadar 24–28 May. Rutgers University and University of Zadar, Zadar, 2010:28–37.

Hartel, J., Kari, J., Stebbins, R., Bates, M. Towards positive information science. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 46(1), 2009.

Harvey, F., Chrisman, N. Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning, A. 1998; 30:1683–1694.

Hassan, R.The Information Society. Cambridge: Polity, 2008.

Hayek, F.A. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review. 1945; 35(4):519–530.

Hayes, C., Avesani, P., Bojars, U., An analysis of bloggers, topics and tags for a blog recommender systemHayes, C., Avesani, P., Bojars, U., eds. From Web to Social Web: Discovering and Deploying User and Content Profiles; vol. 4737. Springer, Berlin, 2007:1–20.

Hayles, N.K. The condition of virtuality. In: Lunenfeld P., ed. The Digital Dialectic: New Essays on New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:58–95.

Haythornthwaite, C., Crowds and communities: light and heavyweight models of peer production. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2009:1–10.

Head, A., Eisenberg, M. How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday:. 15(3), 2010.

Heffernan, V., The death of the open web. The New York Times Magazine. 2010 MM 16, 21 May. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/23/magazine/23FOB-medium-t.html

Heidegger, M. Poetry, Language, Thought. New York: Perennical Classics; 2001.

Heinström, J.Fast Surfers, Broad scanners and Deep Divers: Personality and Information-seeking Behaviour. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University, 2002. [PhD thesis, Information Studies].

Henderson, K. Flexible sketches and inflexible data bases: visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science Technology Human Values. 1991; 16(4):448–473.

Henderson, K. On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 1999.

Herman, E., Nicholas, D. The information enfranchisement of the digital consumer. Aslib Proceedings. 2010; 62(3):245–260.

Hilger, P.Organising Volunteers: Activating Infrastructures and Reflexive Volunteering in the Municipality of Helsinki. Helsinki: City of Helsinki Urban Facts, Urban Research Unit, 2006.

Hill, J.B., Hill, C.M., Sherman, D. Text messaging in an academic library: integrating SMS into digital reference. The Reference Librarian. 2007; 47(1):17–29.

Hillesund, T. Digital reading spaces: how expert readers handle books, the web and electronic paper. First Monday. 15(4), 2010.

Hindman, M.S.The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, N.J.; Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2008.

Hindriks, F. Review of Russell Hardin’s How Do You Know?: The Economics of Ordinary Knowledge. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics. 2010; 3(1):93–97.

Hirzalla, F., van Zoonen, L., de Ridder, J. Internet use and political participation: reflections on the mobilization/normalization controversy. The Information Society. 2011; 27(1):1–15.

Hjorland, B. Library and information science: practice, theory, and philosophical basis. Information Processing & Management. 2000; 36(1):501–531.

Hjorland, B., Albrechtsen, H. Toward new horizon in information science: domain analysis. Journal of American Society for Information Science. 1995; 46(6):400–425.

Holliday, W., Li, Q. Understanding the millennials: updating our knowledge about students. Reference Services Review. 2004; 32(4):356–365.

Holmberg, K., Huvila, I., Kronqvist-Berg, M., Widén-Wulff, G. What is Library 2.0? Journal of Documentation. 2009; 65(4):668–681.

Hooper-Greenhill, E. Museums and the Shaping of Knowledge. London; New York: Routledge; 1992.

Hooper-Greenhill, E. The Educational Role of the Museum. London; New York: Routledge; 1999.

Houghton, J.W., Steele, C., Henty, M. Research practices and scholarly communication in the digital environment. Learned Publishing. 2004; 17(3):231–249.

Hunt, R. Civilisation and its disconnects. AsLib Proceedings. 2008; 60(5):417–443.

Huvila, I. Enta informaatiokirjoitustaito? Reader-and User-Oriented Communication: National Conference of Communication Studies. 2008; 152:22–27.

Huvila, I., Aesthetic judgments in folksonomies as a criteria for organising knowledge. C. Gnoli, F. Mazzocchi. Paradigms and Conceptual Systems in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings of the 11th International ISKO Conference 23–26 February. Ergon Verlag, Rome, 2010:308–315.

Huvila, I. The cool and Belkin faceted classification of information interactions revisited. Information Research. 15(4), 2010.

Huvila, I. Where does the information come from? Information source use patterns in Wikipedia. Information Research. 15(3), 2010.

Huvila, I. The complete information literacy? Unforgetting creation and organisation of information. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2011; 43(4):237–245.

Huvila, I. The politics of boundary objects: hegemonic interventions and the making of a document. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 62(12):2528–2539.

Huvila, I., Authorship and documentary boundary objects. Proceedings of the Hawaii International Converence on System Science 2012, 2012.

Huvila, I., Holmberg, K., Ek, S., Widén-Wulff, G. Social capital in Second Life. Online Information Review. 2010; 34(3):295–316.

Huvila, I., Holmberg, K., Kronqvist-Berg, M., Nivakoski, O. and Widén, G. (forthcoming) ‘What is Librarian 2.0?’, Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.

Hyldegård, J. Personality traits and group-based information behaviour: an exploratory study. Information Research. 14(2), 2009.

IT- og TelestyrelsenDet Digitale Samfund 2010. København, 2011.

Jacobs, D.C., Yudken, J. The Internet, Organizational Change and Labor. London: Taylor & Francis; 2003.

Jakobsson, P., Stiernstedt, F. Pirates of Silicon Valley: state of exception and dispossession in Web 2.0. First Monday. 15(7), 2010.

Jakubik, M. Becoming to know: shifting the knowledge creation paradigm. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2011; 15(3):374–402.

James, J. Are changes in the digital divide consistent with global equality or inequality? The Information Society. 2011; 27(2):121–128.

Jansen, B.J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., Chowdury, A. Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2009; 60(11):2169–2188.

Jenkins, H. The cultural logic of media convergence. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2004; 7(1):33–43.

Jenkins, H. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York and London: New York University Press; 2006.

Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A.J., Weigel, M. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago: MacArthur Foundation; 2006.

Johnson, T.J., Kaye, B.K. Using is believing: the influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism Mass Communication Quarterly. 2000; 77(4):865–879.

Jones, J. Patterns of revision in online writing: a study of Wikipedia’s featured articles. Written Communications. 2008; 25(2):262–289.

Julien, H., Barker, S. How high-school students find and evaluate scientific information: a basis for information literacy skills development. Library & Information Science Research. 2009; 31(1):2–17.

Juskalian, R. Interview with Clay Shirky, part I. Columbia Journalism Review, 19. 2008. [19 December].

Juskalian, R. Interview with Clay Shirky, part II. Columbia Journalism Review, 22. 2008. [22 December].

Kaiser, R. Bibliotheken im Web 2.0 Zeitalter Herausforderungen, Perspektiven und Visionen, 2nd edn. Wiesbaden: Dinges & Frick; 2009.

Kallinikos, J., Aaltonen, A., Marton, A. A theory of digital objects. First Monday. 15(6–7), 2010.

Kamal, A.M., Burkell, J. Addressing uncertainty: when information is not enough/Faire face a l’incertitude: quand l’information ne suffit pas. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science. 2011; 35(4):174–186.

Kari, J., Hartel, J. Information and higher things in life: addressing the pleasurable and the profound in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007; 58(8):1131–1147.

Karsten, H., Lyytinen, K., Hurskainen, M., Koskelainen, T. Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinery project. European Journal of Information Systems. 2001; 10(2):89–98.

Katz, J.E., Aspden, P. Internet dropouts in the USA: the invisible group. Telecommunications Policy. 1998; 22(4/5):327–339.

Kazarnowicz, M., Sociala medier: aktivism eller slacktivism? Being Micke Kazarnowicz: Det /’ar inte ett yrke. Det /’ar en livsstil. 2011 18 July. Available at: http://www.asiktstorped.se/professionellt/sociala-medier/sociala-medier-aktivism-eller-slacktivism/

Kearns, J., Rinehart, R. Personal ontological information responsibility. Library Review. 2011; 60(3):230–245.

Keen, A. The Cult of the Amateur. New York: Doubleday; 2008.

Keller, S. The community telephone. In: Keller S., ed. The Social Impact of the Telephone. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1977:281–298.

Kelly, K., When hard books disappear. The Technium. 2011 blog, 10 June. Available at: http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2011/06/when_hard_books.php

Ketelaar, E. Tacit narratives: the meanings of archives. Archival Science. 2001; 1(2):131–141.

Kittler, F.A. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1999.

Kittler, F.A., Johnston, J. Literature, Media, Information Systems: Essays. Amsterdam: GB Arts International; 1997.

Kjellberg, S. Scholarly blogging practice as situated genre: an analytical framework based on genre theory. Information Research. 14(3), 2009.

Kling, R. Reading "all about" computerization: how genre conventions shape non-fiction social analysis. The Information Society. 1994; 10(3):147–172.

Klingberg, T. The Overflowing Brain: Information Overload and the Limits of Working Memory. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

, Yrittäjyyskasvatus Hallintana. K. Komulainen, S. Keskitalo-Foley, M. Korhonen, S. Lappalainen. Vastapaino, Tampere, 2010.

Kothari, G., Negi, S., Faruquie, T.A., Chakaravarthy, V.T., Venkata Subramaniam, L., SMS based interface for FAQ retrieval. Proceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, 2009:852–860. [vol. 2].

Kow, Y.M., Nardi, B. Culture and creativity: World of Warcraft modding in China and the US. In: Bainbridge W.S., ed. Online Worlds: Convergence of the Real and the Virtual. London: Springer-Verlag; 2010:21–41.

Kuhlthau, C.C. Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1991; 42(5):361–371.

Kuhlthau, C.C. A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation. 1993; 49(4):339–355.

Kuhlthau, C.C. Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited; 2004.

Kuhn, T. Negotiating boundaries between scholars and practitioners: knowledge, networks, and communities of practice. Management Communication Quarterly. 2002; 16(1):106.

Kurzweil, R. The future of libraries part II: the end of books. Library Journal. 1992; 117:140.

Laningham S., ed. developerWorks Interviews: Tim Berners-Lee. IBM:, 2006 Available at: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206.txt

Lankes, R.D. Trusting the Internet: new approaches to credibility tools. In: Metzger M.J., Flanagin A.J., eds. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.

Lankshear, C., Knobel, M. Introduction: digital literacies – concepts, policies and practices. In: Lankshear C., Knobel M., eds. Digital Literacies: Concepts, Policies and Practices. New York: Peter Lang; 2008:1–16.

Lanzara, G.F. Remediation of practices: how new media change the ways we see and do things in practical domains. First Monday. 15(6–7), 2010.

Large, A., Beheshti, J., Rahman, T. Gender differences in collaborative web searching behavior: an elementary school study. Information Processing and Management. 2002; 38(3):427–443.

Latour, B., Woolgar, S. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1986.

Leadbeater, C., Miller, P. The Pro-Am Revolution: How Enthusiasts Are Changing Our Economy and Society. London: Demos; 2004.

Leaning, M. The Internet, Power and Society: Rethinking the Power of the Internet to Change Lives. Oxford: Chandos Pub; 2009.

Leckie, G.J., Given, L., Campbell, G. Technologies of social regulation: an examination of library OPACs and web portals. In: Leckie G.J., Buschman J., eds. Information Technology in Librarianship: New Critical Approaches. Westport, CN: Libraries Unlimited; 2009:228–259.

Lee, C.P. Boundary negotiating artifacts: unbinding the routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 2007; 16(3):307–339.

Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., Zickuhr, K. Social Media & Mobile Internet Use Among Teens and Young Adults. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2010.

Leppälä, S. Review of Russell Hardin, how do you know? The economics of ordinary knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics. 2011; 24:77–80.

Lessig, L. Free Culture: How Big Media Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Control Creativity. New York: Penguin; 2004.

Lewis, C., Finders, M. Implied adolescents and implied teachers: a generation gap for new times. In: Alvermann D.E., ed. Adolescents and Literacies in a Digital World. New York: Peter Lang; 2002:101–113.

Licoppe, C. The "crisis of the summons": a transformation in the pragmatics of "notifications", from phone rings to instant messaging. The Information Society. 2010; 26(4):288–302.

Liikkanen M., Hanifi R., Hannula U., eds. Yksilöllisiä valintoja, Kulttuurien Pysyvyyttä Vapaa-Ajan Muutokset 1981–2002. Helsingfors: Statistikcentralen, 2005.

Limberg, L., Sundin, O. Teaching information seeking: relating information literacy education to theories of information behaviour. Information Research. 12(1), 2006.

Lin, Y.-W. A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 2011; 17(1):53–71.

Linn, S. Consuming Kids: The Hostile Takeover of Childhood. New York: The New Press; 2004.

Liu, Z. Print vs. electronic resources: a study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Information Processing & Management. 2006; 42(2):583–592.

Locke, C., Levine, R., Searls, D., Weinberger, D. The Cluetrain Manifesto: The End of Business as Usual. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books; 2000.

Lomborg, S. Navigating the blogosphere: towards a genre-based typology of weblogs. First Monday:. 14(5), 2009.

Love, H. Attributing Authorship: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press; 2002.

Luyt, B., Azura, I. The sigh of the information literate: an examination of the potential for oppression in information literacy. Information Research. 15(3), 2010.

Lyman, P., Varian, H.R. How Much Information? 2000. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley; 2000.

Lyman, P., Varian, H.R. How Much Information? 2003. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley; 2003.

MacDonald, G.F., Alsford, S. The museum as information utility. Museum Management and Curatorship. 1991; 10(3):305–311.

Mackey, M. Literacies Across Media: Playing the Text. London; New York: Routledge/Falmer; 2002.

Macpherson, A., Jones, O., Oakes, H., Mediating artefacts, boundary objects and the social construction of knowledge. paper given at First International Conference on Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities, OLKC 1, 20–22 March. University of Warwick:, 2006 Available at: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/conf/olkc/archive/olkc1/papers/133_macpherson.pdf

Mager, A. Mediated health: sociotechnical practices of providing and using online health information. New Media Society. 2009; 11(7):1123–1142.

Mambrey, P., Robinson, M., Understanding the role of documents in a hierarchical flow of work. GROUP 97: Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, New York, 1997:119–127.

Mannermaa, M. Jokuveli: Elämä Ja Vaikuttaminen Ubiikkiyhteiskunnassa. Helsinki: WSOYPro; 2008.

Manovich, L. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press; 2001.

Mansourian, Y. Coping strategies in web searching. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems. 2008; 42(1):28–39.

Mansourian, Y., Ford, N. Web searchers’ attributions of success and failure: an empirical study. Journal of Documentation. 2007; 63(5):659–679.

Mansourian, Y., Ford, N., Webber, S., Madden, A. An integrative model of "information visibility" and "information seeking" on the web. Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems. 2008; 42(4):402–417.

Marchionini, G. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

Martin, A. Literacies for the digital age. In: Martin A., Madigan D., eds. Digital Literacies for Learning. London: Facet Publishing; 2006:3–25.

Martin, B. Knowledge management. ARIST. 2008; 42(1):369–424.

Marty, P.F. Meeting user needs in the modern museum: profiles of the new museum information professional. Library & Information Science Research. 2006; 28(1):128–144.

Marty, P.F. Museum professionals and the relevance of LIS expertise. Library & Information Science Research. 2007; 29(2):252–276.

Marty, P.W., Rayward, B., Twidale, M.B. Museum informatics. Information Today. 2003; 37:259–294.

Mattelart, A. Histoire de la société de l’information. Paris: La Découverte; 2001.

Mattelart, A. Informaatioyhteiskunnan Historia. Tampere: Vastapaino; 2003.

Mauss, M. Essai sur le Don, forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. Année Sociologique. 1925; Ser. 2:30–186.

May, C. The Information Society: A Sceptical View. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2002.

McKemmish, S. Placing records continuum theory and practice. Archival Science. 2001; 1(4):333–359.

McKenzie, P.J. A model of information practices in accounts of everyday-life information seeking. Journal of Documentation. 2003; 59(1):19–40.

McLuhan, M. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1962.

McLuhan, M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Part 1. New York: Mentor; 1964.

Medierådet. Ungar & Medier 2008: Fakta Om Barns och Ungas Användning och Upplevelser av Medier. Stockholm; 2008.

Menne-Haritz, A., Appraisal or selection: can a content oriented appraisal be harmonized with the principle of provenance?. The Principle of Provenance: Report from the First Stockholm Conference on Archival Theory and the Principle of Provenance, 2–3 September 1993. Riksarkivet, Stockholm, 1994:103–126.

Menne-Haritz, A. Access: the reformulation of an archival paradigm. Archival Science. 2001; 1(1):57–82.

Mezzadra, S., Neilson, B. Border as method, or, the multiplication of labor. Transversal. 6, 2008.

Michaels, D., Putting on the brakes: mankind nears the end of the age of speed: as space shuttle nears retirement, flyboys pause to reflect on a slowdown. The Wall Street Journal 2011; April. Available at: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704587004576242450234233350.html

Montesi, M. Genre analysis of bookmarked webpages. Online Information Review. 2010; 34:954–971.

Montgomery, K.C. Generation Digital: Politics, Commerce, and Childhood in the Age of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007.

Morville, P. Ambient Findability. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly; 2005.

Morville, P., Callender, J. Search Patterns. Sebastopol. CA; Farnham: O’Reilly Media; 2010.

Mouffe, C. On the Political. London; New York: Routledge; 2005.

Mutch, A. Information literacy: an exploration. International Journal of Information Management. 1997; 17(5):377–386.

Myburgh, S., What is a book and can it change? Digitalcollaboration. 2011 blog, 30 May. Available at: http://digitalcollaboration.wordpress.com/2011/05/30/what-is-a-book-and-can-it-change/

Nahl D., Bilal D., eds. Information and Emotion: The Emergent Affective Paradigm in Information Behavior Research and Theory. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2007.

Nardi, B., Kow, Y.M. Digital imaginaries: how we know what we (think we) know about Chinese gold farming. First Monday. 15(6–7), 2010.

Nature, Encyclopaedia Britannica and Nature: a response. Nature 2006; 23 March. Available at: http://www.nature.com/press_releases/Britannica_response.pdf

Nelson Associates. User Survey of the New York Public Library Research Libraries. DC: Washington; 1969.

Nicholas, D., Herman, E. Assessing Information Needs in the Age of the Digital Consumer. London; New York: Routledge; 2009.

Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I. Digital Consumers: Reshaping the Information Profession. London: Facet; 2008.

Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Williams, P. Google generation II: web behaviour experiments with the BBC. Aslib Proceedings. 2011; 63:28–45.

Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., Clark, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R., et al. UK scholarly e-book usage – a landmark survey. Aslib Proceedings. 2008; 60(4):311–334.

Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Rowlands, I., Jamali, H.R. Researchers’ e-journal use and information seeking behaviour. Journal of Information Science. 2010; 36(4):494–516.

Nickerson, R., Landauer, T. Human-computer interaction: background and issues. In Helander M., Landauer T., Prabhu P., eds.: Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd edn, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1997.

Nilsson, Å. Kulturvanor i Sverige 1987–2010. Göteborg: SOM Institutet, Göteborgs Universitet; 2011.

Niu, X., Hemminger, B.M., Lown, C., Adams, S., Brown, C., et al. National study of information seeking behavior of academic researchers in the United States. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2010; 61(5):869–890.

Nolin, J.M. Speedism, boxism and markism: three ideologies of the Internet. First Monday. 15(10), 2010.

Norris, P. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Post-Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.

Norris, P. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty & the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.

Obst, O. RS1.2: patterns and costs of printed and online journal usage. Health Information and Libraries Journal. 2003; 20(1):22–32.

O’Neil, M., The sociology of critique in Wikipedia. Critical Studies in Peer Production. 2011;1(2) Available at: http://cspp.oekonux.org/research/mass-peer-activism/rs-1.2-sociology-of-critique

Oppermann, E. The discourse of adaptation to climate change and the UK Climate Impacts Programme: de-scribing the problematization of adaptation. Climate and Development. 2011; 3:71–85.

O’Regan, G. The Internet revolution. In: O’Regan G., ed. A Brief History of Computing. London: Springer; 2008:179–201.

O’Reilly, C.A., III. Variations in decision makers’ use of information sources: the impact of quality and accessibility of information. The Academy of Management Journal. 1982; 25(4):756–771.

O’Reilly, T., Battelle, J. Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly and Techweb; 2009.

Orlikowski, W.J. The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science. 1992; 3(3):398–427.

Østerlund, C. The materiality of communicative practices: the boundaries and objects of an emergency room genre. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems. 2008; 20:7–40.

Palfrey, J., Gasser, U. Born Digital: Understanding the First Generation of Digital Natives. New York: Basic Books; 2008.

Pálsdóttir, A. Icelanders and trust in the Internet as a source of health and life-style information. Information Research. 16(1), 2011.

Pantzar, M. Future shock: discussing the changing temporal architecture of daily life. Journal of Futures Studies. 2010; 14(4):1–22.

Pattuelli, M.C., Rabina, D. Forms, effects, function: LIS students’ attitudes towards portable e-book readers. Aslib Proceedings. 2010; 62(3):228–244.

Paus-Hasebrink, I., Wijnen, C., Brussel, T. Social Web im Alltag von Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen: Soziale Kontexte und Handlungstypen (unter Mitarbeit von Ursula Vieider). In: Schmidt J., Paus-Hasebrink I., Hasebrink U., eds. Heranwachsen mit dem Social Web: Zur Rolle von Web 2.0: Angeboten im Alltag von Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen. Berlin: Vistas Verlag; 2009:122–206.

Picard, R. Affective Computing. Cambridge, MA; London: MIT Press; 1997.

Picone, I. Produsage as a form of self-publication: a qualitative study of casual news produsage. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 2011; 17(1):99–120.

Poderi, G. Comparing featured article groups and revision patterns correlations in Wikipedia. First Monday. 14(5), 2009.

Pohjalainen, M., Talja, S. Ikäjohtaminen yleisissä kirjastoissa: ikäkäsitysten tarkastelua osaamisen johtamisen näkökulmasta. Informaatiotutkimus. 2011; 30(1):1–11.

Pohjola, P. ‘The pragmatic web: some key issues’, in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Semantic Systems. New York: ACM; 2010.

Postigo, H. Questioning the Web 2.0 discourse: social roles, production, values, and the case of the human rights portal. The Information Society. 2011; 27(3):181–193.

Postman, N. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Knopf; 1992.

Prabha, C., Connaway, L.S., Olszewski, L., Jenkins, L.R. What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation. 2007; 63(1):74–89.

Prensky, M. Digital natives, digital immigrants. On The Horizon. 2001; 9(5):1–6.

Prensky, M. H. sapiens digital: from digital immigrants and digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education. 2009; 5:9.

Profit, S.K. Text messaging at reference: a preliminary survey. The Reference Librarian. 2008; 49(2):129–134.

Proulx, S., ‘Web participatif: vers un engagement citoyen de l’usager?’. Éthique et droits de l’homme dans la société de l’information, Commission francaise pour l’UNESCO et Conseil de l’Europe, 2007. [Strasbourg, 13–14 septembre 2007].

Proulx, S., Heaton, L., Choon, M.J.K., Millette, M. Paradoxical empowerment of produsers in the context of informational capitalism. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 2011; 17(1):9–29.

Pugh, L. Change Management in Information Services. Aldershot; Burlington, VT: Ashgate; 2007.

Pursell, C. The Machine in America: A Social History of Technology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.

Pyati, A.K. Herbert Marcuse: liberation, utopia, and revolution. In: Leckie G.J., Given L.M., Buschman J., eds. Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited; 2010:237–248.

Raban, D.R., Ronen, I., Guy, I. Acting or reacting? Preferential attachment in a people-tagging system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2011; 62(4):738–747.

Radford, G.P., Radford, M.L. Libraries, librarians, and the discourse of fear. Library Quarterly. 2001; 71(3):299–329.

Radford, M.L., Connaway, L.S., "I stay away from the unknown, I guess": measuring impact and understanding critical factors for millennial generation and adult non-users of virtual reference services. Online Proceedings of the Fifth Annual iConference. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2010:26–33. [3–6 February].

Rainie, L. Internet, Broadband, and Cell Phone Statistics. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2010.

Rainie, L., Horrigan, J. Getting Serious Online: As Americans Gain Experience, They Pursue More Serious Activities. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2002.

Rasanen, P. The persistence of information structures in Nordic countries. The Information Society. 2008; 24(4):219–228.

Rask, M. The reach and richness of Wikipedia: is wikinomics only for rich countries? First Monday. 13(6), 2008.

Rayward, W.B. Visions of Xanadu: Paul Otlet (1868–1944) and hypertext. Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 1994; 45(4):235–250.

Rheingold, H. Smart Mobs: the Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Basic Books; 2003.

Rheingold, H. ‘Attention literacy’, blog, City Brights: Howard Rheingold, 20 April. Available at: http://blog.sfgate.com/rheingold/2009/04/20/attention-literacy/, 2009.

Ridi, R., Biblioteche, enciclopedie e web: utopie convergentiNuovo A., Petrucciani A., Ruffini G., eds. Pensare le biblioteche: studi e interventi offerti a Paolo Traniello. Sinnos: Rome, 2008:385–402 Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/16788/

Riles, A. Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press; 2011.

Rivoltella, P.C. Knowledge, culture, and society in the information age. In: Rivoltella P.C., ed. Digital Literacy: Tools and Methodologies for Information Society. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing; 2008:1–25.

Rosa, C. De, Cantrell, J., Hawk, J., Wilson, A. College Students’ Perceptions of Libraries and Information Resources. Dublin, OH: OCLC; 2006.

Ross, C.S., McKechnie, L., Rothbauer, P.M. Reading Matters: What the Research Reveals About Reading, Libraries, and Community. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited; 2006.

Rosser, J.B. A Nobel Prize for asymmetric information: the economic contributions of George Akerlof, Michael Spence and Joseph Stiglitz. Review of Political Economy. 2003; 15(1):3–21.

Rowlands, I., Fieldhouse, M., Information behavior of the researcher of the future. Ciber briefing paper, London, 2008. University College London, the British Library and JISC. Available at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf

Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., et al. The Google generation: the information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings. 2008; 60(4):290–310.

Rubin, R.E. Foundations of Library and Information Science, 2nd ed. New York: Neal-Schuman; 2004.

Ruiz, C., The history of Web 2.0 starts at Darcy DiNucci: the proof, 2009. blog, Cole20.com, 29 January. Available at: http://www.cole20.com/who-coined-web-20-darcy-dinucci/

Rushkoff, D. ‘Renaissance prospects’, podcast, ITConversations, October. Available at: http://www.itconversations.com/shows/detail243.html, 2004.

Rushkoff, D. Program or Be Programmed: Ten Commands for a Digital Age. New York: OR Books; 2010.

Saad, C. ‘How does Facebook view the world?’ Mashable, 4 June. Available at: http://mashable.com/2010/06/04/facebook-data-portability/, 2010.

Saarti, J., Raivio, J. How to communicate with a machine: on reading a public library’s OPAC. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2011; 43(1):22–29.

Saracevic, T. Relevance: a review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2007; 58(13):1915–1933.

Sauperl, A., Saye, J.D. Have we made any progress? Catalogues of the future revisited. Journal of Documentation. 2009; 65(3):500–514.

Savolainen, R. ‘Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of "way of life"’. Library and Information Science Research. 1995; 17(3):259–294.

Savolainen, R. Filtering and withdrawing: strategies for coping with information overload in everyday contexts. Journal of Information Science. 2007; 33(5):611–621.

Savolainen, R. Small world and information grounds as contexts of information seeking and sharing. Library & Information Science Research. 2009; 31(1):38–45.

Savolainen, R. Dietary blogs as sites of informational and emotional support. Information Research. 15(4), 2010.

Savolainen, R. Requesting and providing information in blogs and internet discussion forums. Journal of Documentation. 2011; 67(5):863–886.

Savolainen, R., Kari, J. Placing the Internet in information source horizons: a study of information seeking by internet users in the context of self-development. Library & Information Science Research. 2004; 26(4):415–433.

Savolainen, R., Kari, J. Facing and bridging gaps in web searching. Information Processing & Management. 2006; 42(2):519–537.

Schivelbusch, W. The Railway Journey: The Industrialization of Time and Space in the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1986.

, Zur Rolle von Web 2.0: Angeboten im Alltag von Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen. J.-H. Schmidt, U. Hasebrink, I. Paus-Hasebrink. Vistas, Berlin, 2009.

Schoop, M., de Moor, A., Dietz, J.L.G. The pragmatic web: a manifesto. Communications of the ACM. 2006; 49:75–76.

Schroer, J., Hertel, G. ‘Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: wikipedians, and why they do it’, F/OSS Research Community. Available at: http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/Schroer_Hertel_Wikipedia_Motivation.pdf, 2007.

Schroer, J., Hertel, G. Voluntary engagement in an open web-based encyclopedia: wikipedians and why they do it. Media Psychology. 2009; 1:96–120.

Schumpeter, J.A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper; 1950.

Segev, E. Google and the Digital Divide: the Bias of Online Knowledge. Oxford: Chandos; 2010.

Segev, E., Ahituv, N. Popular searches in Google and Yahoo!: a digital divide in information uses? The Information Society. 2010; 1:17–37.

Sellen, A.J., Harper, R.H.R. The Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2002.

Research, Sentio. Den Som Soker Finner: En Kvalitativ Undersokelse Om Hvordan Studenter og Forskere Soker Informasjon og Litteratur pa Internett. Oslo: UBiT; 2010.

Servon, L.J. Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community, and Public Policy. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2002.

Shachaf, P. The paradox of expertise: is the Wikipedia Reference Desk as good as your library? Journal of Documentation. 2009; 65(6):977–996.

Shang, S.S.C., Li, E.Y., Wu, Y.-L., Hou, O.C.L. Understanding Web 2.0 service models: a knowledge-creating perspective. Information & Management. 2011; 4–5:178–184.

Sharkey, J., Brandt, D.S. Integrating technology literacy and information literacy. In: Rivoltella P.C., ed. Digital Literacy: Tools and Methodologies for Information Society. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing; 2008:85–97.

Shaw, R. From facts to judgments: theorizing history for information science. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science & Technology. 2009; 36(2):13–18.

Shirky, C. Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age. New York: Penguin Press; 2010.

Shneiderman, B. Creating creativity: user interfaces for supporting innovation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2000; 7(1):114–138. [March:].

Simmel, G. The metropolis and mental life. In: Farganis J., ed. Readings in Social Theory: The Classic Tradition to Post-Modernism. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000:149–157.

Simon, H.A. A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1955; 69(1):99–118.

Sinn, D. Room for archives? Use of archival materials in No Gun Ri research. Archival Science. 2010; 10(2):117–140.

Skågeby, J. Pre-produsage and the remediation of virtual products. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia. 2011; 17(1):141–159.

Smith, A., Schlozman, K.L., Verba, S., Brady, H. The Internet and Civic Engagement. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2009.

Smith, V. New forms of work organization. Annual Review of Sociology. 1997; 23:315–339.

Södergard, P. Virtuell gemenskap. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University, Information Studie; 2007. [PhD thesis].

Sonnenwald, D.H. Evolving perspectives of human information behavior: contexts, situations, social networks and information horizons. In: Wilson T.D., Allen D.K., eds. Exploring the Contexts of Information Behavior. Cambridge: Taylor and Graham; 1999:176–190.

Southerton, D., Warde, A., Cheng, S.-L., Olsen, W. ‘Trajectories of time spent reading as a primary activity: a comparison of the Netherlands, Norway, France, UK and USA since the 1970s’, CRESC Working Paper Series 39. Manchester: Centre for Research on Socio-Cultural Change, University of Manchester; 2007.

Spiranec, S., Zorica, M.B. Information literacy 2.0: hype or discourse refinement? Journal of Documentation. 2010; 66(1):140–153.

Star, S.L. Ceci n’est pas un objet-frontiére! Réflexions sur l’origine d’un concept. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances. 2010; 4(1):18–35.

Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R. Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science. 1989; 19(3):387–420.

Stebbins, R.A. Leisure and its relationship to library and: information science: bridging the gap. Library Trends. 2009; 57(4):618–631.

Steiner, P. On the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog. The New Yorker. 1993; 69(20):61.

Stensson, P. ‘Thoughts about the consequences of inappropriate application of systems engineering’, in Proceedings of the 7th European Systems Engineering Conference. Stockholm; 2010.

Stern, C.M. ‘Information literacy "unplugged": teaching information literacy without technology’, white paper, UNESCO, the US National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy, for use at the Information Literacy Meeting of Experts. Prague; 2002.

Stevenson, S. Michel Aglietta and regulation theory. In: Leckie G.J., Given L.M., Buschman J., eds. Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited; 2010:1–13.

Stiglitz, J.E. The theory of screening, education, and the distribution of income. The American Economic Review. 1975; 65(3):283–300.

Stillinger, J. Multiple Authorship and the Myth of Solitary Genius. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1991.

Stoerger, S. The digital melting pot: bridging the digital native-immigrant divide. First Monday. 14(7), 2009.

Stover, M. The reference librarian as non-expert: a postmodern approach to expertise. The Reference Librarian. 2004; 42(87):273–300.

Subrahmanian, E., Monarch, I., Konda, S., Granger, H., Milliken, R., et al. Boundary objects and prototypes at the interfaces of engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). 2003; 12(2):185–203.

Sundqvist, A. The use of records: a literature review. Archives & Social Studies. 2007; 1(1):623–653.

Sunstein, C.R. Democracy and filtering. Communications of the ACM. 2004; 47:57–59.

Sunstein, C.R. Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.

Suominen, V. The problem of "userism", and how to overcome it in library theory. Information Research. 12(4), 2007.

Sutherland, I. The Ultimate Display. Washington, DC: Advanced Research Projects Agency; 1965.

Swart, J., Harvey, P. Identifying knowledge boundaries: the case of networked projects. Journal of Knowledge Management. 2011; 15(5):703–721.

Swigon, M. Information limits: definition, typology and types. Aslib Proceedings. 2011; 63(4):364–379.

Tagliacozzo, R., Kochen, M. Information-seeking behavior of catalog users. Information Storage and Retrieval. 1970; 6(5):363–381.

Talja, S., Hartel, J. ‘Revisiting the user-centred turn in information science research: an intellectual history perspective’, in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information ScienceFeaturing the Future, supplement to. Information Research. 12(4), 2007.

Tapscott, D. The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. New York; San Francisco; Washington: McGraw-Hill; 1995.

Tapscott, D. Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing the World. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2009.

Tapscott, D., Williams, A.D. Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. New York: Portfolio; 2006.

Taylor, R. Information use environments. In: Dervin, B., Voigt, M., eds. Progress in Communication Sciences, vol. 10. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1991:217–255.

Taylor, R.S. Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries. 1968; 29:178–194.

Tenopir, C., Hitchcock, B., Pillow, A. ‘Use and users of electronic library resources: an overview and analysis of recent research studies’, Report 120. Council on Library and Information Resources; 2003.

Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Boyce, P., Grayson, M., Zhang, Y., et al. Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine. 9(5), 2003.

Thelwall, M. No place for news in social network web sites? Online Information Review. 2008; 32(6):726–744.

Thelwall, M. Introduction to Webometrics: Quantitative Web Research for the Social Sciences. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool; 2009.

Thelwall, M., Vaughan, L. New versions of PageRank employing alternative web document models. Aslib Proceedings. 2004; 56:24–33.

Thornham, H., McFarlane, A. Cross-generational gender constructions: women, teenagers and technology. The Sociological Review. 2011; 59(1):64–85.

de Tocqueville, A. L’Ancien Régime et la Révolution. Paris: Michel Lévy Frères; 1866.

Toffler, A. Future Shock. New York: Random House; 1970.

Toffler, A. The Third Wave. New York: Morrow; 1980.

Toyama, K., Technology as amplifier in international development. Proceedings of the 2011 Conference. ACM, New York, 2011:75–82.

Tredinnick, L. Digital Information Culture: The Individual and Society in the Digital Age. Oxford: Chandos; 2008.

Tuominen, K. User centered discourse: an analysis of the subject positions of the user and the librarian. Library Quarterly. 1997; 67(4):350–371.

Turkle, S. The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, 20th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2005.

Vaidhyanathan, S. The Googlization of Everything. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press; 2011.

Valentine, B., Bernhisel, S. Teens and their technologies in high school and college: implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2008; 34(6):502–512.

Vasalou, A., Joinson, A.N., Courvoisier, D. Cultural differences, experience with social networks and the nature of true commitment in Facebook. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2010; 68(10):719–728.

Vashist, R., McKay, J., Marshall, P., How well do we understand boundary practices? Empirical evidence from a practice of business analysts. Proceedings of ICT and Sustainable Service Development, the 19th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2011), 2011. [Helsinki, 9–11 June, paper 158].

Verdegem, P. Social media for digital and social inclusion: challenges for information society 2.0 research & policies. triple-C. 9(1), 2011.

Virilio, P. L’esthetique de la disparition. Paris: Galilée; 2004.

Vygotsky, L.S. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978.

Warner, J. Human Information Retrieval. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2010.

Warr, W.A. Social software: fun and games, or business tools? Journal of Information Science. 2008; 34(4):591–604.

Warschauer, M. Reconceptualizing the digital divide. First Monday. 7(7), 2002.

Warschauer, M. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.

Washburn, W. Collecting information, not objects. Museum News. 1984; 62(3):5–15.

Webber, S., Johnston, B. Conceptions of information literacy: new perspectives and implications. Journal of Information Science. 2000; 26(6):381–397.

Weinberger, D. Everything Is Miscellaneous. New York: Times Books; 2007.

Weinberger, D., ‘Knowledge in the age of abundance’, audio recording, keynote audio at LITA [Library and Information Technology Association] Forum 2009, 2009. Available at: http://litablog.org/2009/10/forum-2009-keynote-audio-david-weinberger/

Weinberger, D. ‘Clay Shirky, info overload, and when filters increase the size of what’s filtered’, blog, Joho the Blog, 31 January. Available at: http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/01/31/2b2k-clay-shirky-info-overload-and-when-filters-increase-the-size-of-whats-filtered/, 2010.

Weinberger, D. ‘The iPad is the future of the past of books’, blog, Joho the Blog, 28 January. Available at: http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2010/01/28/the-ipad-is-the-future-of-the-past-of-books/, 2010.

Weinberger, D. ‘Respect the Internet’, blog, JOHO the Blog, 5 October. Available at: http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/2011/10/05/respect-the-Internet/, 2011.

Weingarten, F.W. Credibility, politics, and public policy. In: Metzger M.J., Flanagin A.J., eds. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2007:181–202.

Wellman, B., Giulia, M. Virtual communities as communities: net surfers don’t ride alone. In: Smith M.A., Kollock P., eds. Communities in Cyberspace. London: Routledge; 1999:167–193.

Wenger, E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

Wertsch, J.V. The zone of proximal development: some conceptual issues. New Directions for Child Development. 1983; 23:7–18.

White, D., Manton, M., Le Cornu, A. Isthmus: Headline Findings Report. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2009.

White, D.S., Le Cornu, A. Visitors and residents: a new typology for online engagement. First Monday. 16(9), 2011.

Whitworth, A. Information Obesity. Cambridge: Chandos; 2009.

Wiegand, W.A. The rich potential of American public school library history: research needs and opportunities for historians of education and librarianship. Libraries & the Cultural Record. 2007; 42(1):57–74.

Wiener, N. Cybernetics, or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1948.

Wikipedia, Statistics. Wikimedia Foundation, 2010. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Statistics

Wikipedia, Wikipedia:About. Wikimedia Foundation, 2010. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:About

Wikipedia, Wikipedia:Expert retention. Wikimedia Foundation, 2010. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Expert_retention

Wikipedia, Existentialism, 2012. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existentialism

Wilder, S. Information literacy makes all the wrong assumptions. Chronicle of Higher Education. 2005; 51(18):B13.

Wilkinson, S.C., Reader, W., Payne, S.J. Adaptive browsing: sensitivity to time pressure and task difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2012; 70(1):14–25.

Williams, D., Gownder, J.P., Wiramihardja, L., Corbett, A.E. US Consumers Are Willing Co-Creators: Activate Engaged Consumers with Social Technologies to Build Better Products. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research; 2010.

Williamson, K., Asla, T. Information behavior of people in the fourth age: implications for the conceptualization of information literacy. Library & Information Science Research. 2009; 31(2):76–83.

Wirtén, E.H. No Trespassing: Authorship, Intellectual Property Rights, and the Boundaries of Globalization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2004.

Wormbs, N. Det digitala imperativet. In: Andersson J., Snickars P., eds. Efter the Pirate Bay. Stockholm: Kungliga Biblioteket; 2010:140–150.

Wyatt, S. Non-users also matter: the construction of users and non-users of the Internet. In: Oudshoorn N., Pinch T.J., eds. How Users Matter: The Co-construction of Users and Technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003:67–79.

Wyatt, S., Thomas, G., Terranova, T. They came, they surfed, they went back to the beach: conceptualizing use and non-use of the Internet. In: Woolgar S., ed. Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002:23–40.

Wynne, B. Creating public alienation: expert cultures of risk and ethics on GMOs. Science as Culture. 2001; 10(4):445–481.

Xue, G.-R., Yang, Q., Zeng, H.-J., Yu, Y., Chen, Z. ‘Exploiting the hierarchical structure for link analysis’, in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. New York: ACM; 2005. [186–93].

Zach, L. When is enough enough? Modeling the information-seeking and stopping behavior of senior arts administrators. Journal of the American Society of Information Science. 2005; 56(1):23–35.

Zacklad, M., Barbaud, X. ‘Vers une application du web socio sémantique pour la réalisation d’un système d’information destiné aux réseaux de santé’, paper given at Second séminaire francophone du Web Sémantique Mèdical, 9 mars 2004. Rouen; 2004.

Zerubavel, E. The Fine Line: Making Distinctions in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991.

Zhang, J. ‘Ontology and the semantic web’, in Proceedings of the North American Symposium on. Knowledge Organization.. 1(9–20), 2007.

Zimmer, M. Preface: critical perspectives on Web 2.0. First Monday. 13(3), 2008.